PASTABench: Proactive Assessment of Sequential Trajectories for Agent Safety
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance also fits: General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents that alter real-world states, ensuring operational safety across multi-step workflows has become a critical challenge. While recent work has moved beyond single-turn evaluation toward multi-turn paradigms, key limitations persist: step-level methods treat actions in isolation, missing how risks accumulate, while trajectory-level evaluations operate post-hoc, offering no opportunity for timely intervention. To address these limitations, we formalize Decoupled Proactive Safety Monitoring along three dimensions: whether to intervene, when to intervene, and what the risk is. We introduce PASTABench, a benchmark of 1,139 multi-turn trajectories spanning 5 risk categories and 13 subcategories. We further propose the Optimal Intervention Window (OIW), anchored by annotated Earliest-Signal and Trigger turns, to quantify intervention timeliness. Evaluation of 16 LLMs reveals that proactive intervention remains largely unsolved, with the best model achieving only 40.74% optimal-timing interventions. Fine-grained diagnosis further uncovers pervasive lexical overfitting: competitive safety scores of smaller models mask keyword hypersensitivity rather than genuine risk comprehension, as their proactive capability largely collapses once hazard vocabulary is neutralized.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 32 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
32 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ToolSafe: Enhancing Tool Invocation Safety of LLM-based agents via Proactive Step-level Guardrail and Feedback15 Jan
- 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems27 Nov
- 2025OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents17 Jun
- 2025Personalized Constitutionally-Aligned Agentic Superego: Secure AI Behavior Aligned to Diverse Human Values8 Jun
- 2025GUARDIAN: Safeguarding LLM Multi-Agent Collaborations with Temporal Graph Modeling25 May
- 2025Nuclear Deployed: Analyzing Catastrophic Risks in Decision-making of Autonomous LLM Agents17 Feb
- 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents19 Dec
- 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep
Other references · 24
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
- 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165
- 2024Llama Guard 3 Vision: Safeguarding Human-AI Image Understanding Conversationscited by 129
- 2024ToolSword: Unveiling Safety Issues of Large Language Models in Tool Learning Across Three Stagescited by 82
12 more
- 2024SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Mannercited by 63
- 2024Defense Against Prompt Injection Attack by Leveraging Attack Techniquescited by 40
- 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 37
- 2025SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMscited by 22
- 2024Hazards in Daily Life? Enabling Robots to Proactively Detect and Resolve Anomaliescited by 19
- 2025GSPR: Aligning LLM Safeguards as Generalizable Safety Policy Reasonerscited by 13
- 2026What, Whether and How? Unveiling Process Reward Models for Thinking with Images Reasoningcited by 7
- 2025Towards Evaluating Proactive Risk Awareness of Multimodal Language Modelscited by 6
- 2024Toward Intelligent and Secure Cloud: Large Language Model Empowered Proactive Defensecited by 4
- 2025YETI (YET to Intervene) Proactive Interventions by Multimodal AI Agents in Augmented Reality Taskscited by 4
- 2025SemEval-2025 Task 9: The Food Hazard Detection Challengecited by 4
- 2025Chemist Eye: A Visual Language Model-Powered System for Safety Monitoring and Robot Decision-Making in Self-Driving Laboratoriescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PROACT-Agent: Progressive Runtime Oversight and Active Circuit-breaking for Real-Time Safety
- 2026ATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis
- 2026Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States
- 2026PreAct-Bench: Benchmarking Predictive Monitoring in LLMs
- 2026StepSafe: Learning Timely Intervention with Context-Aware Safety Reasoning
- 2026Risky-Bench: Probing Agentic Safety Risks under Real-World Deployment
- 2025ProbGuard: Proactive Runtime Monitoring for LLM Agent Safety via Probabilistic Prediction
- 2026Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety