DynSTEER: Dynamic Stage-wise Trajectory Evaluation and Execution-time Review for Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model agents are increasingly deployed for long-horizon task execution, raising a central granularity question for trajectory evaluation: whole-trajectory verification is too coarse to capture concrete failures and their associated evidence in long trajectories, while atomic-step scoring is too fine-grained, noise-sensitive, and computationally expensive. This granularity gap makes a single-reference trajectory paradigm inadequate for assessing the rich space of valid agent execution paths and delays timely feedback and early stopping in long-horizon tasks. To address these issues, we propose DynSTEER, a dynamic stage-wise framework for agent trajectory evaluation. DynSTEER bridges the granularity gap through stage-wise dynamic evaluation that segments rollouts at key execution nodes and adapts its multi-level review strategy based on stage-level results; it compiles a path-tolerant milestone graph from available task inputs to preserve diverse legal paths without reference leakage; and it supports terminating unrecoverable agent executions to curb resource waste. Experimental results show that DynSTEER improves evaluation discriminability by over 85% compared with whole-trajectory evaluation and saves 17.74% of execution steps. The code is available at https://github.com/zhichao-stone/DynSTEER
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026EarlyEval: Cheaper Agent Evaluation via Early Outcome Prediction2 Sep
- 2025Agent-Testing Agent: A Meta-Agent for Automated Testing and Evaluation of Conversational AI Agents24 Aug
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 14
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
- 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 254
- 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
- 2025AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectoriescited by 99
- 2025TRAJECT-Bench:A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool Usecited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
- 2026Long-Horizon Agent Trajectory Attribution: A Unified Benchmark and Fine-Grained Annotation Framework
- 2026Redundant or Necessary? A Benchmark for Detecting Redundant Steps in Agent Trajectories
- 2026Slipstream: Trajectory-Grounded Compaction Validation for Long-Horizon Agents
- 2026OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories
- 2026AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
- 2026TRAJDEBUG: Tracing Error Lifecycle to Identify Critical Failures in Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories
- 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents