mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UNMASK: Discovering and Causally Verifying Spurious Shortcuts in Text Classifiers

arXiv 2608.09209 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural language models trained on large crowdsourced corpora frequently exploit spurious surface patterns tied to target labels without true linguistic or causal relevance, boosting benchmark performance while failing on adversarial or out-of-distribution inputs. Existing approaches either require manual specification of the feature vocabulary or automate discovery only partially, leaving the gap between dataset-level correlation and model-level exploitation unaddressed. We present U N M ASK, a fully automated pipeline that discovers, causally verifies, and mitigates spurious correlations in text classifiers without additional human annotation. Given unlabeled training examples, U N M ASK generates candidate surface patterns as executable boolean expressions, filters them through a statistical validation protocol with independent replication, and establishes causal model dependence via verified counterfactual interventions. Causally confirmed features then serve as annotation-free group definitions for Deep Feature Reweighting, eliminating the group labels that standard DFR requires. Applied to BERT and RoBERTa trained on MNLI, our pipeline independently rediscovers established lexical-overlap and negation biases, verifying 9 of 10 features on BERT and 6 on RoBERTa, and improving HANS accuracy by up to 12.58 pp. On CivilComments-WILDS, programmatic groups match the 70.1% worst- group accuracy of hand-labeled DFR (Kirichenko et al., 2023) without demographic annotation. We further demonstrate that the discovery and validation stages generalize to reward model preference data, surfacing interpretable spurious correlations in RewardBench2.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

44 of 54 references.

References · 44

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  6. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  7. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  8. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
32 more
  1. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  2. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  3. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  4. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  5. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
  6. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  7. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  8. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
  9. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  10. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
  11. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  12. 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
  13. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
  14. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  15. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 127
  16. 2025Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgecited by 119
  17. 2019Towards Causal VQA: Revealing and Reducing Spurious Correlations by Invariant and Covariant Semantic Editingcited by 108
  18. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  19. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
  20. 2021Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Datacited by 91
  21. 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
  22. 2021Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Modelscited by 76
  23. 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59
  24. 2022Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 54
  25. 2024From Lists to Emojis: How Format Bias Affects Model Alignmentcited by 48
  26. 2021An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 42
  27. 2021Toward Annotator Group Bias in Crowdsourcingcited by 14
  28. 2024DISCERN: Decoding Systematic Errors in Natural Language for Text Classifierscited by 8
  29. 2022Partial-input baselines show that NLI models can ignore context, but they don'tcited by 6
  30. 2025SpurLens: Automatic Detection of Spurious Cues in Multimodal LLMscited by 6
  31. 2025Spurious Correlation-Aware Embedding Regularization for Worst-Group Robustnesscited by 2
  32. 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlations in NLI via LLM-Synthesized Counterfactuals and Dynamic Balanced Samplingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?
  2. 2026Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs
  3. 2026SURGELLM: Rethinking Multi-Task Evaluation through Task-Aware Feature Gating with Class-Balanced Normalization
  4. 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlations in LLMs via Causality-Aware Post-Training
  5. 2025CLUE: Non-parametric Verification from Experience via Hidden-State Clustering
  6. 2025Data Curation Matters: Model Collapse and Spurious Shift Performance Prediction from Training on Uncurated Text Embeddings
  7. 2024ROIC-DM: Robust Text Inference and Classification via Diffusion Model
  8. 2025Biases in Large Language Model-Elicited Text: A Case Study in Natural Language Inference