mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Spurious Correlations in NLI via LLM-Synthesized Counterfactuals and Dynamic Balanced Sampling

arXiv 2512.18462 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural Language Inference (NLI) models frequently rely on spurious correlations rather than semantic reasoning. Existing mitigation strategies often incur high annotation costs or trigger catastrophic forgetting during fine-tuning. We propose an automated, scalable pipeline to address these limitations. First, we introduce Log-Frequency LMI (LF-LMI) to accurately detect semantic artifacts. Second, we generate a high-quality synthetic contrast set via an LLM-synthesis pipeline with multi-judge verification. Finally, we introduce Dynamic Balanced Sampling, a training strategy that rotates the original data distribution to prevent forgetting. Our method improves consistency on a challenging benchmark from 63.5% to 81.0% while maintaining 88.4% in-domain accuracy, significantly outperforming naive fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 13 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  2. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  3. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  4. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  5. 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.