mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DISCERN: Decoding Systematic Errors in Natural Language for Text Classifiers

arXiv 2410.22239 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their high predictive accuracies, current machine learning systems often exhibit systematic biases stemming from annotation artifacts or insufficient support for certain classes in the dataset. Recent work proposes automatic methods for identifying and explaining systematic biases using keywords. We introduce DISCERN, a framework for interpreting systematic biases in text classifiers using language explanations. DISCERN iteratively generates precise natural language descriptions of systematic errors by employing an interactive loop between two large language models. Finally, we use the descriptions to improve classifiers by augmenting classifier training sets with synthetically generated instances or annotated examples via active learning. On three text-classification datasets, we demonstrate that language explanations from our framework induce consistent performance improvements that go beyond what is achievable with exemplars of systematic bias. Finally, in human evaluations, we show that users can interpret systematic biases more effectively (by over 25% relative) and efficiently when described through language explanations as opposed to cluster exemplars.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

Builds on

26 of 46 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  10. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
14 more
  1. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  2. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  3. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
  4. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 396
  5. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  6. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
  7. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  8. 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
  9. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 128
  10. 2022Distilling Model Failures as Directions in Latent Spacecited by 82
  11. 2023Explaining black box text modules in natural language with language modelscited by 61
  12. 2022When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetcited by 60
  13. 2023Active Learning Principles for In-Context Learning with Large Language Modelscited by 53
  14. 2023Targeted Data Generation: Finding and Fixing Model Weaknessescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.