mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ask-E: An Environment for Calibrated Question Generation

arXiv 2608.06933 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today, we improve models by training and evaluating them on problems at the frontier of their abilities. Creating such problems is itself a demanding task, requiring the ability to probe model limits and generalize beyond existing question distributions. It also means placing problems at a precise difficulty level, which requires understanding what it takes to solve them. In short, generating problems calibrated to a model's current frontier demands capability beyond it, an increasingly burdensome constraint as models improve. Our key insight is that we can leverage this constraint to our advantage: a model that can generate problems consistently calibrated to a given frontier must possess capability beyond it. Accordingly, we present Ask-E, an environment that benchmarks and trains models on their ability to write questions at a given skill level, rather than answer them. Concretely, we define target skill levels as ranges bounded by the capabilities of two existing language models. A generated question is successfully calibrated if exactly one of the two models can solve it, placing it precisely within the target range and differentiating the capabilities of these models. Ask-E serves both as a benchmark and a training environment, where models generate problems calibrated to a variety of skill levels. We find that even frontier models achieve below 50% calibration on the benchmark, leaving significant headroom to measure future progress. We also show that training on this environment leads to improvements across a number of downstream math benchmarks even with no new math data, no interaction with stronger models, and no correctness-based reward.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

41 of 64 references.

References · 41

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  6. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  7. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  8. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
  9. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  10. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  11. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  12. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
29 more
  1. 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 344
  2. 2025MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attentioncited by 263
  3. 2025R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Datacited by 228
  4. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMscited by 137
  5. 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 101
  6. 2025SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  7. 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 88
  8. 2025SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoningcited by 83
  9. 2025Towards Robust Mathematical Reasoningcited by 73
  10. 2025QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks?cited by 63
  11. 2025OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalizationcited by 50
  12. 2025Self-Questioning Language Modelscited by 50
  13. 2024AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Constructioncited by 44
  14. 2025Language Self-Play For Data-Free Trainingcited by 43
  15. 2024Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instructioncited by 42
  16. 2024AI-Assisted Generation of Difficult Math Questionscited by 37
  17. 2025SPELL: Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Evolving Long-Context Language Modelscited by 29
  18. 2025The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gainscited by 28
  19. 2024U-MATH: A University-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Skills in LLMscited by 24
  20. 2023How Useful are Educational Questions Generated by Large Language Models?cited by 23
  21. 2021Question Generation for Adaptive Educationcited by 22
  22. 2024Learning to Ask Informative Questions: Enhancing LLMs with Preference Optimization and Expected Information Gaincited by 21
  23. 2025How to Get Your LLM to Generate Challenging Problems for Evaluationcited by 11
  24. 2025When Judgment Becomes Noise: How Design Failures in LLM Judge Benchmarks Silently Undermine Validitycited by 11
  25. 2025CodeClash: Benchmarking Goal-Oriented Software Engineeringcited by 10
  26. 2025BeyondBench: Contamination-Resistant Evaluation of Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 8
  27. 2026Riemann-Bench: A Benchmark for Moonshot Mathematicscited by 8
  28. 2025DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE: Self Evolution of Language Model Reasoningcited by 6
  29. 2026Do Reasoning Models Ask Better Questions? A Formal Information-Theoretic Analysis on Multi-Turn LLM Gamescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.