mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE: Self Evolution of Language Model Reasoning

arXiv 2505.15734 ↗First posted 21 May 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have improved significantly in their reasoning through extensive training on massive datasets. However, relying solely on additional data for improvement is becoming increasingly impractical, highlighting the need for models to autonomously enhance their reasoning without external supervision. In this paper, we propose Debate, Train, Evolve (DTE), a novel ground truth-free training framework that uses multi-agent debate traces to evolve a single language model. We also introduce a new prompting strategy Reflect-Critique-Refine, to improve debate quality by explicitly instructing agents to critique and refine their reasoning. Extensive evaluations on seven reasoning benchmarks with six open-weight models show that our DTE framework achieve substantial improvements, with an average accuracy gain of 8.92% on the challenging GSM-PLUS dataset. Furthermore, we observe strong cross-domain generalization, with an average accuracy gain of 5.8% on all other benchmarks, suggesting that our method captures general reasoning capabilities. Our framework code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/ctrl-gaurav/Debate-Train-Evolve

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  6. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  7. 2025Phi-4-reasoning Technical Reportcited by 151
  8. 2023Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Modelscited by 91
  9. 2025Towards Reasoning Ability of Small Language Modelscited by 29
  10. 2024Automatic Instruction Evolving for Large Language Modelscited by 26
  11. 2023SELF: Self-Evolution with Language Feedbackcited by 24
  12. 2024Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 24
2 more
  1. 2024ACC-Collab: An Actor-Critic Approach to Multi-Agent LLM Collaborationcited by 24
  2. 2025Think, Prune, Train, Improve: Scaling Reasoning without Scaling Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Self-Improvement of Language Models by Post-Training on Multi-Agent Debate
  2. 2025Debate, Reflect, and Distill: Multi-Agent Feedback with Tree-Structured Preference Optimization for Efficient Language Model Enhancement
  3. 2026Learning from Self-Debate: Preparing Reasoning Models for Multi-Agent Debate
  4. 2026On the Generalization Gap in Self-Evolving Language Model Reasoning
  5. 2026ARMOR-MAD: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Debate in Large Language Model Reasoning
  6. 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning
  7. 2025Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models
  8. 2024Diversity of Thought Elicits Stronger Reasoning Capabilities in Multi-Agent Debate Frameworks