mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DHMark: Public-Key Watermarking for LLM-Generated Text via Diffie-Hellman-Guided Rejection Sampling

arXiv 2608.03093 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) watermarking provides an important mechanism for tracing the provenance of generated text. Existing statistical watermarks are often effective and robust, but most of them rely on private detection keys, which centralizes verification and complicates public auditing. Recent public or publicly verifiable watermarking schemes improve key management, yet many of them rely on exact recovery of embedded cryptographic strings, making them fragile under token edits, truncation, copy-paste, and low-entropy generation. This paper introduces DHMark, a public-key watermarking framework for LLM-generated text. The key idea is to separate payload authorization from noisy textual evidence. An issuer signs a short registry payload bound to a public context, and the payload is expanded into many one-bit equations. During generation, a Diffie-Hellman-guided token-labeling interface assigns each candidate token a public equation vote, and the sampler softly or selectively promotes candidates whose votes agree with the authorized payload. During verification, third-party verifiers use public information to extract token votes, aggregate them into equation-level evidence, and score only signed registry records. This design avoids exact recovery of a long embedded signature and instead treats watermark detection as registry-aided statistical evidence aggregation. We formalize the public-verification setting, analyze label pseudorandomness, registry-backed soundness, and sampling distortion, and evaluate a prototype under truncation, substitution, copy-paste, wrong-context, and plain-generation attacks. In the default 32-bit configuration, DHMark maintains at least a 0.967 valid rate across eight edit conditions while yielding a 0.000 acceptance rate on three negative controls.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 21

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025PVMark: Enabling Public Verifiability for LLM Watermarking Schemes30 Oct
  2. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Models19 Jun
  3. 2024Watermark under Fire: A Robustness Evaluation of LLM Watermarking20 Nov
  4. 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models20 Jun
  5. 2024Bileve: Securing Text Provenance in Large Language Models Against Spoofing with Bi-level Signature4 Jun
  6. 2024Topic-Based Watermarks for Large Language Models2 Apr
  7. 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules1 Apr
  8. 2024An Entropy-based Text Watermarking Detection Method20 Mar
  9. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions19 Mar
  10. 2024WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-off6 Mar
  11. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models13 Dec
  12. 2023A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing15 Nov
9 more
  1. 2023WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Models13 Nov
  2. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  3. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  4. 2023Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models1 Aug
  5. 2023An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models30 Jul
  6. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  7. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  8. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 3

  1. 2023WatME: Towards Lossless Watermarking Through Lexical Redundancycited by 27
  2. 2024Revisiting the Robustness of Watermarking to Paraphrasing Attackscited by 25
  3. 2025SparSamp: Efficient Provably Secure Steganography Based on Sparse Samplingcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025HeavyWater and SimplexWater: Distortion-Free LLM Watermarks for Low-Entropy Next-Token Predictions
  2. 2023Towards Codable Watermarking for Injecting Multi-bits Information to LLMs
  3. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models
  4. 2026VOW: Verifiable and Oblivious Watermark Detection for Large Language Models
  5. 2025Breaking Distortion-free Watermarks in Large Language Models
  6. 2026Tracing Provenance and Detecting Tampering with Complementary LLM Watermarks
  7. 2026ChainMark: Model-Free LLM Watermarking with Closed-Form Calibration
  8. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Models