mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaking Distortion-free Watermarks in Large Language Models

arXiv 2502.18608 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, LLM watermarking has emerged as an attractive safeguard against AI-generated content, with promising applications in many real-world domains. However, there are growing concerns that the current LLM watermarking schemes are vulnerable to expert adversaries wishing to reverse-engineer the watermarking mechanisms. Prior work in breaking or stealing LLM watermarks mainly focuses on the distribution-modifying algorithm of Kirchenbauer et al. (2023), which perturbs the logit vector before sampling. In this work, we focus on reverse-engineering the other prominent LLM watermarking scheme, distortion-free watermarking (Kuditipudi et al. 2024), which preserves the underlying token distribution by using a hidden watermarking key sequence. We demonstrate that, even under a more sophisticated watermarking scheme, it is possible to compromise the LLM and carry out a spoofing attack, i.e. generate a large number of (potentially harmful) texts that can be attributed to the original watermarked LLM. Specifically, we propose using adaptive prompting and a sorting-based algorithm to accurately recover the underlying secret key for watermarking the LLM. Our empirical findings on LLAMA-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct, Gemma-7b, and OPT-125M challenge the current theoretical claims on the robustness and usability of the distortion-free watermarking techniques.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

24 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024De-mark: Watermark Removal in Large Language Models17 Oct
  2. 2024Large Language Model Watermark Stealing With Mixed Integer Programming30 May
  3. 2024Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks28 May
  4. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions19 Mar
  5. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  6. 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices25 Feb
  7. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models13 Dec
  8. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
  9. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks1 Dec
  10. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models7 Nov
  11. 2023REMARK-LLM: A Robust and Efficient Watermarking Framework for Generative Large Language Models18 Oct
  12. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
4 more
  1. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  2. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  3. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  4. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 8

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  4. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  5. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  6. 2024Is Cosine-Similarity of Embeddings Really About Similarity?cited by 89
  7. 2025Training Sparse Mixture Of Experts Text Embedding Modelscited by 32
  8. 2023Stealing the Decoding Algorithms of Language Modelscited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.