LoopsBench: From Harness Engineering to Loop Engineering in Coding Agent Evaluation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Coding agent infrastructure is shifting from harness engineering toward loop engineering as coding agents are deployed for sustained long-horizon software development. Existing benchmarks often center on localized tasks or end-state outcomes, offering limited insight into sustained execution. We introduce LOOPSBENCH, a long-horizon benchmark for loop engineering in coding agent evaluation. Each task is a dependency DAG over separately testable development units with source-evidenced prerequisite edges. LOOPSBENCH comprises 112 tasks from authentic sources spanning 8 programming languages and 9 domains. Its flow-aware runtime releases tests along the ready frontier and retains completed nodes as regression obligations. We evaluate frontier coding agents paired with widely used loop implementations. The strongest configuration, Opus-4.7 with Claude Code and outer continuation, resolves 25.00% of tasks. Recorded plans recover only part of the source-recovered prerequisite DAG, and regression events remain visible across the evaluated loop profiles. We open source the benchmark data and code, including all tasks, more than 5,300 development units, and executable tests, at microsoft/Loopsbench.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
36 of 64 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2026SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade Over Long-Horizon Iterative Tasks25 Mar
- 2026FormulaCode: Evaluating Agentic Optimization on Large Codebases16 Mar
- 2026BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?3 Mar
- 2026LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces15 Feb
- 2026FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Development11 Feb
- 2026OmniCode: A Benchmark for Evaluating Software Engineering Agents2 Feb
- 2025SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios20 Dec
- 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents14 Dec
- 2025Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software Engineering18 Feb
- 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym30 Dec
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
- 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents1 Jul
2 more
Other references · 22
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
10 more
- 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
- 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 254
- 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
- 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 165
- 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 153
- 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 115
- 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 99
- 2025RefactorBench: Evaluating Stateful Reasoning in Language Agents Through Codecited by 28
- 2025RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions?cited by 17
- 2024DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents
- 2026PERFOPT-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Software Performance Optimization
- 2026EvoCode-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Multi-Turn Iterative Interactions
- 2026ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development
- 2026RoadmapBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Agentic Software Development Across Version Upgrades
- 2025GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging
- 2026LoLBench: Evaluating Coding Agents with Long-Horizon Proposals on Large Software Systems
- 2026SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution