mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DisasterTD: Disaster Toponym Disambiguation Using Multimodal LLMs and Cross-View Geolocalization

arXiv 2607.24856 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social media imagery (SMI) provides timely and fine-grained ground perspectives that are valuable for situational awareness and emergency response. Unlike satellite or aerial imagery, SMI can capture disaster impacts and ground-level conditions in a timely manner. However, geographic references in SMI are often vague or ambiguous, making accurate geolocalization challenging. To address this issue, we propose DisasterTD, a disaster toponym disambiguation framework that integrates multimodal large language model (MLLMs)-based semantic reasoning with cross-view geolocalization. First, MLLMs extract toponyms and generate candidate geolocations from noisy textual inputs. Then, cross-view matching between SMI, remote sensing imagery (RSI), and optionally street-view imagery (SVI) is used to verify and refine these candidate results. We evaluate DisasterTD on the Hurricane Harvey dataset, where SMI is augmented with collected RSI and SVI to construct a cross-view benchmark for disaster geolocalization. The dataset is divided into four categories based on toponym clarity and ambiguity, allowing a fine-grained performance analysis across scenarios. Results show that DisasterTD consistently outperforms MLLM-only and cross-view-only baselines without disambiguation, achieving geolocalization accuracies of 71.62% within 1000 m, 62.36% within 500 m, 57.99% within 250 m, 52.09% within 100 m, and 47.01% within 50 m, while reducing the mean and median errors to 11.33 km and 0.68 km, respectively. The largest improvements appear in ambiguous toponyms, where semantic reasoning with cross-view evidence reduces candidate dispersion and errors. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating MLLM-based candidate generation with cross-view verification for fine-grained disaster geolocalization.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2026.

Builds on

30 of 74 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  7. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  8. 2023SpectralGPT: Spectral Remote Sensing Foundation Modelcited by 250
  9. 2015Wide-Area Image Geolocalization with Aerial Reference Imagerycited by 185
  10. 2022TransGeo: Transformer Is All You Need for Cross-view Image Geo-localizationcited by 166
  11. 2020University-1652: A Multi-view Multi-source Benchmark for Drone-based Geo-localizationcited by 152
  12. 2016PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 114
18 more
  1. 2021Coming Down to Earth: Satellite-to-Street View Synthesis for Geo-Localizationcited by 112
  2. 2023Sample4Geo: Hard Negative Sampling For Cross-View Geo-Localisationcited by 107
  3. 2016Localizing and Orienting Street Views Using Overhead Imagerycited by 93
  4. 2019Optimal Feature Transport for Cross-View Image Geo-Localizationcited by 90
  5. 2016Predicting Ground-Level Scene Layout from Aerial Imagerycited by 89
  6. 2023Cross-City Matters: A Multimodal Remote Sensing Benchmark Dataset for Cross-City Semantic Segmentation using High-Resolution Domain Adaptation Networkscited by 55
  7. 2024Where am I? Cross-View Geo-localization with Natural Language Descriptionscited by 38
  8. 2023Simple, Effective and General: A New Backbone for Cross-view Image Geo-localizationcited by 36
  9. 2023Geo-knowledge-guided GPT models improve the extraction of location descriptions from disaster-related social media messagescited by 31
  10. 2024Cross-View Geolocalization and Disaster Mapping with Street-View and VHR Satellite Imagery: A Case Study of Hurricane IANcited by 22
  11. 2022Location reference recognition from texts: A survey and comparisoncited by 17
  12. 2026Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: Evolving from Unimodality to Multimodalitycited by 12
  13. 2024Unsupervised Multi-view UAV Image Geo-localization via Iterative Renderingcited by 9
  14. 2025GeoLocSFT: Efficient Visual Geolocation via Supervised Fine-Tuning of Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 9
  15. 2018A Coherent Unsupervised Model for Toponym Resolutioncited by 8
  16. 2025Towards Generative Location Awareness for Disaster Response: A Probabilistic Cross-view Geolocalization Approachcited by 6
  17. 2022How can voting mechanisms improve the robustness and generalizability of toponym disambiguation?cited by 2
  18. 2025Street-Level Geolocalization Using Multimodal Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Large Language Models for Geolocation Extraction in Humanitarian Crisis Response
  2. 2025Enhancing Geo-localization for Crowdsourced Flood Imagery via LLM-Guided Attention
  3. 2024StreetviewLLM: Extracting Geographic Information Using a Chain-of-Thought Multimodal Large Language Model
  4. 2025DisasterM3: A Remote Sensing Vision-Language Dataset for Disaster Damage Assessment and Response
  5. 2026CaST: Causal Discovery via Spatio-Temporal Graphs in Disaster Tweets
  6. 2025A Multimodal, Multilingual, and Multidimensional Pipeline for Fine-grained Crowdsourcing Earthquake Damage Evaluation
  7. 2025MONITRS: Multimodal Observations of Natural Incidents Through Remote Sensing
  8. 2026CrisiSense-RAG: Crisis Sensing Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Rapid Disaster Impact Assessment