mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Large Language Models for Geolocation Extraction in Humanitarian Crisis Response

arXiv 2602.08872 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humanitarian crises demand timely and accurate geographic information to inform effective response efforts. Yet, automated systems that extract locations from text often reproduce existing geographic and socioeconomic biases, leading to uneven visibility of crisis-affected regions. This paper investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can address these geographic disparities in extracting location information from humanitarian documents. We introduce a two-step framework that combines few-shot LLM-based named entity recognition with an agent-based geocoding module that leverages context to resolve ambiguous toponyms. We benchmark our approach against state-of-the-art pretrained and rule-based systems using both accuracy and fairness metrics across geographic and socioeconomic dimensions. Our evaluation uses an extended version of the HumSet dataset with refined literal toponym annotations. Results show that LLM-based methods substantially improve both the precision and fairness of geolocation extraction from humanitarian texts, particularly for underrepresented regions. By bridging advances in LLM reasoning with principles of responsible and inclusive AI, this work contributes to more equitable geospatial data systems for humanitarian response, advancing the goal of leaving no place behind in crisis analytics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

19 of 55 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  3. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  4. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  5. 2024Large Language Models are Geographically Biasedcited by 91
  6. 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 90
  7. 2022InstructionNER: A Multi-Task Instruction-Based Generative Framework for Few-shot NERcited by 31
  8. 2023Geo-knowledge-guided GPT models improve the extraction of location descriptions from disaster-related social media messagescited by 31
  9. 2019Man is to Person as Woman is to Location: Measuring Gender Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 28
  10. 2020Assessing Demographic Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 23
  11. 2025StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs' Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputscited by 23
  12. 2025Towards LLMs Robustness to Changes in Prompt Format Stylescited by 21
7 more
  1. 2025Harnessing Large Language Models for Disaster Management: A Surveycited by 20
  2. 2018A Pragmatic Guide to Geoparsing Evaluationcited by 17
  3. 2023Improving Toponym Resolution with Better Candidate Generation, Transformer-based Reranking, and Two-Stage Resolutioncited by 7
  4. 2025Unequal Opportunities: Examining the Bias in Geographical Recommendations by Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2024Evaluation of Geographical Distortions in Language Modelscited by 6
  6. 2023Leave no Place Behind: Improved Geolocation in Humanitarian Documentscited by 5
  7. 2025Evaluating Named Entity Recognition Models for Russian Cultural News Texts: From BERT to LLMcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Large-Language-Model Framework for Automated Humanitarian Situation Reporting
  2. 2026A Lightweight LLM Framework for Disaster Humanitarian Information Classification
  3. 2026DisasterTD: Disaster Toponym Disambiguation Using Multimodal LLMs and Cross-View Geolocalization
  4. 2025GeoResponder: Towards Building Geospatial LLMs for Time-Critical Disaster Response
  5. 2023GeoLM: Empowering Language Models for Geospatially Grounded Language Understanding
  6. 2025Empowering LLM Agents with Geospatial Awareness: Toward Grounded Reasoning for Wildfire Response
  7. 2024GeoReasoner: Reasoning On Geospatially Grounded Context For Natural Language Understanding
  8. 2024Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Next Location Predictors