A Coherent Unsupervised Model for Toponym Resolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Toponym Resolution, the task of assigning a location mention in a document to a geographic referent (i.e., latitude/longitude), plays a pivotal role in analyzing location-aware content. However, the ambiguities of natural language and a huge number of possible interpretations for toponyms constitute insurmountable hurdles for this task. In this paper, we study the problem of toponym resolution with no additional information other than a gazetteer and no training data. We demonstrate that a dearth of large enough annotated data makes supervised methods less capable of generalizing. Our proposed method estimates the geographic scope of documents and leverages the connections between nearby place names as evidence to resolve toponyms. We explore the interactions between multiple interpretations of mentions and the relationships between different toponyms in a document to build a model that finds the most coherent resolution. Our model is evaluated on three news corpora, two from the literature and one collected and annotated by us; then, we compare our methods to the state-of-the-art unsupervised and supervised techniques. We also examine three commercial products including Reuters OpenCalais, Yahoo! YQL Placemaker, and Google Cloud Natural Language API. The evaluation shows that our method outperforms the unsupervised technique as well as Reuters OpenCalais and Google Cloud Natural Language API on all three corpora; also, our method shows a performance close to that of the state-of-the-art supervised method and outperforms it when the test data has 40% or more toponyms that are not seen in the training data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Location reference recognition from texts: A survey and comparisoncited by 17
- 2023Improving Toponym Resolution with Better Candidate Generation, Transformer-based Reranking, and Two-Stage Resolutioncited by 7
- 2023Mordecai 3: A Neural Geoparser and Event Geocodercited by 6
- 2024Where on Earth Do Users Say They Are?: Geo-Entity Linking for Noisy Multilingual User Inputcited by 4
- 2023Arukikata Travelogue Dataset with Geographic Entity Mention, Coreference, and Link Annotationcited by 2
- 2026DisasterTD: Disaster Toponym Disambiguation Using Multimodal LLMs and Cross-View Geolocalizationcited by 2
- 2024Graph-Structured Trajectory Extraction from Traveloguescited by 1
- 2026Georeferencing Non-Gazetteered Place Names using Biological Specimen Recordscited by 0
- 2026Georeferencing Non-Gazetteered Place Names using Biological Specimen Records7 Aug 2026
- 2026DisasterTD: Disaster Toponym Disambiguation Using Multimodal LLMs and Cross-View Geolocalization26 Jul 2026
- 2024Graph-Structured Trajectory Extraction from Travelogues22 Oct 2024
- 2024Where on Earth Do Users Say They Are?: Geo-Entity Linking for Noisy Multilingual User Input29 Apr 2024
- 2023Arukikata Travelogue Dataset with Geographic Entity Mention, Coreference, and Link Annotation23 May 2023
- 2023Improving Toponym Resolution with Better Candidate Generation, Transformer-based Reranking, and Two-Stage Resolution18 May 2023
- 2023Mordecai 3: A Neural Geoparser and Event Geocoder23 Mar 2023
- 2022Location reference recognition from texts: A survey and comparison4 Jul 2022