mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prospects for quantum advantage in machine learning from the representability of functions

arXiv 2512.15661 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Demonstrating quantum advantage in machine learning tasks requires navigating a complex landscape of proposed models and algorithms. To bring clarity to this search, we introduce a framework that connects the structure of parametrized quantum circuits to the mathematical nature of the functions they can actually learn. Within this framework, we show how fundamental properties, like circuit depth and non-Clifford gate count, directly determine whether a model's output leads to efficient classical simulation or surrogation. We argue that this analysis uncovers common pathways to dequantization that underlie many existing simulation methods. More importantly, it reveals critical distinctions between models that are fully simulatable, those whose function space is classically tractable, and those that remain robustly quantum. This perspective provides a conceptual map of this landscape, clarifying how different models relate to classical simulability and pointing to where opportunities for quantum advantage may lie.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

16 of 73 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  2. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
  3. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  4. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  5. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
  6. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 133
  7. 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 92
  8. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 80
  9. 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
  10. 2024Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks are Effectively Classically Simulablecited by 37
  11. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  12. 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 26
4 more
  1. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 25
  2. 2023Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 22
  3. 2020Tensor network approaches for learning non-linear dynamical lawscited by 7
  4. 2022Minimizing low-rank models of high-order tensors: Hardness, span, tight relaxation, and applicationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Revisiting dequantization and quantum advantage in learning tasks
  2. 2023A Framework for Demonstrating Practical Quantum Advantage: Racing Quantum against Classical Generative Models
  3. 2026Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison
  4. 2025Superior resilience to poisoning and amenability to unlearning in quantum machine learning
  5. 2024Reinforcement learning-based architecture search for quantum machine learning
  6. 2025Machine Unlearning in the Era of Quantum Machine Learning: An Empirical Study
  7. 2026Canonical quantization of neurons
  8. 2026Entanglement as a Structural Complexity Axis: A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalization in Quantum Policies and Value Functions