mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provable learning separation for predicting time-evolution of quantum many-body systems

arXiv 2607.06472 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2026quant-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations? We address this problem by studying the learnability of quantum many-body dynamics from the perspective of probably approximately correct (PAC)-learning. Concretely, we devise a supervised learning problem where the training set consists of specifications of randomized stabilizer probe states, evolution times sampled uniformly from a polynomially large time interval [0,T], coupled with expectation values of certain observables evaluated on the resulting time-evolved state under an unknown Hamiltonian. For this learning task, we provide an efficient quantum procedure whose training phase learns the underlying Hamiltonian from short-time training samples, and whose deployment phase combines Hamiltonian simulation with the classical shadows protocol to perform inference on a newly given data point. By contrast, the existence of O(mathsfpoly(n))-time instances ensures classical hardness: by embedding a mathsfBQP-complete computation into the polynomially long time-dynamics of a low-intersection variant of the Feynman-Kitaev clock Hamiltonian construction, we show that, for a certain family of input distributions, no randomized classical polynomial-time algorithm can fulfill our learning condition, unless mathsfBQPsubseteqmathsfP/poly. Furthermore, we show that the classically hard instance maintains quantum learnability. We also give an interpretation of our results in learning-assisted certified quantum simulation. Taken together, our results demonstrate a rigorous learning separation for a natural ML task based on Hamiltonian evolution, while building connections between quantum learning theory, quantum simulation, and QML.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 110 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
  2. 2022Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processescited by 35
  3. 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 26
  4. 2023Learning quantum Hamiltonians at any temperature in polynomial timecited by 23
  5. 2024Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensingcited by 8
  6. 2024Predicting Ground State Properties: Constant Sample Complexity and Deep Learning Algorithmscited by 7
  7. 2025Towards efficient quantum algorithms for diffusion probabilistic modelscited by 6
  8. 2025Nearly optimal algorithms to learn sparse quantum Hamiltonians in physically motivated distancescited by 5
  9. 2025Quantum Probe Tomographycited by 5
  10. 2024Testing and learning structured quantum Hamiltonianscited by 4
  11. 2024Improved algorithms for learning quantum Hamiltonians, via flat polynomialscited by 3
  12. 2026Optimal detection of dissipation in Lindbladian dynamicscited by 3
1 more
  1. 2026Heisenberg-limited Hamiltonian learning without short-time controlcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.