Provable learning separation for predicting time-evolution of quantum many-body systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given that quantum computers are naturally suited to simulate the behavior of quantum many-body systems, an immediate question arises: can one formulate physically motivated quantum machine learning (QML) tasks that exhibit learning separations? We address this problem by studying the learnability of quantum many-body dynamics from the perspective of probably approximately correct (PAC)-learning. Concretely, we devise a supervised learning problem where the training set consists of specifications of randomized stabilizer probe states, evolution times sampled uniformly from a polynomially large time interval [0,T], coupled with expectation values of certain observables evaluated on the resulting time-evolved state under an unknown Hamiltonian. For this learning task, we provide an efficient quantum procedure whose training phase learns the underlying Hamiltonian from short-time training samples, and whose deployment phase combines Hamiltonian simulation with the classical shadows protocol to perform inference on a newly given data point. By contrast, the existence of O(mathsfpoly(n))-time instances ensures classical hardness: by embedding a mathsfBQP-complete computation into the polynomially long time-dynamics of a low-intersection variant of the Feynman-Kitaev clock Hamiltonian construction, we show that, for a certain family of input distributions, no randomized classical polynomial-time algorithm can fulfill our learning condition, unless mathsfBQPsubseteqmathsfP/poly. Furthermore, we show that the classically hard instance maintains quantum learnability. We also give an interpretation of our results in learning-assisted certified quantum simulation. Taken together, our results demonstrate a rigorous learning separation for a natural ML task based on Hamiltonian evolution, while building connections between quantum learning theory, quantum simulation, and QML.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.
Builds on
13 of 110 references.
References · 13
- 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
- 2022Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processescited by 35
- 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 26
- 2023Learning quantum Hamiltonians at any temperature in polynomial timecited by 23
- 2024Learning k-body Hamiltonians via compressed sensingcited by 8
- 2024Predicting Ground State Properties: Constant Sample Complexity and Deep Learning Algorithmscited by 7
- 2025Towards efficient quantum algorithms for diffusion probabilistic modelscited by 6
- 2025Nearly optimal algorithms to learn sparse quantum Hamiltonians in physically motivated distancescited by 5
- 2025Quantum Probe Tomographycited by 5
- 2024Testing and learning structured quantum Hamiltonianscited by 4
- 2024Improved algorithms for learning quantum Hamiltonians, via flat polynomialscited by 3
- 2026Optimal detection of dissipation in Lindbladian dynamicscited by 3
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Cautious optimism for deep parameterized quantum circuits23 Jul 2026