mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A super-polynomial quantum-classical separation for density modelling

arXiv 2210.14936 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2022quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Density modelling is the task of learning an unknown probability density function from samples, and is one of the central problems of unsupervised machine learning. In this work, we show that there exists a density modelling problem for which fault-tolerant quantum computers can offer a super-polynomial advantage over classical learning algorithms, given standard cryptographic assumptions. Along the way, we provide a variety of additional results and insights, of potential interest for proving future distribution learning separations between quantum and classical learning algorithms. Specifically, we (a) provide an overview of the relationships between hardness results in supervised learning and distribution learning, and (b) show that any weak pseudo-random function can be used to construct a classically hard density modelling problem. The latter result opens up the possibility of proving quantum-classical separations for density modelling based on weaker assumptions than those necessary for pseudo-random functions.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  2. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  3. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
  4. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  5. 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 76
  6. 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
  7. 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical datacited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.