REDDIT: Forgetting-Resistant Correction of Timestamp Drift in ASR via Replay-Based Distribution Editing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern autoregressive ASR systems can emit timestamps as decoded tokens, enabling timestamped transcription without frame-level aligners or inference-time post-processing. We show that these generated timestamps can drift across long non-speech spans: the transcript may remain plausible, but the decoded time axis drifts away from the audio. We study this non-speech-induced timestamp drift with self-built gap and long-gap benchmarks across 15 evaluated timestamp-producing ASR and audio-language systems. Naive timestamp-corrected fine-tuning improves alignment but can severely degrade non-target ASR behavior, exposing a forgetting problem. We propose REDDIT(REplay-based Distribution eDITing), a lightweight two-stage post-training framework that corrects timestamps while avoiding this catastrophic forgetting: it first edits timestamp targets under the model's own replayed decoder context while matching the frozen base distribution on non-timestamp tokens, then applies a short edited-prefix refinement stage. In this framework, we construct correction supervision without human transcripts or human timestamp annotations by combining VAD-trimmed speech spans with inserted non-speech gaps and known concatenation offsets. On Whisper-tiny, 34.9 hours of targeted correction audio used and only 1.6% of model parameters updated, raising long-gap mIoU from 38.7% to 95.0% and reducing mixed-gap out-of-domain AAS from 2752 ms to 223 ms while preserving CV-en MER at 41.3% (versus 524.2% for ordinary SFT decoder tuning).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.
Builds on
60 of 94 references.
References · 60
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
38 more
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 707
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agentscited by 538
- 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 468
- 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 363
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
- 2023Augmenting Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 189
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
- 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
- 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attackscited by 157
- 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakagecited by 150
- 2025Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMscited by 148
- 2024The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistantscited by 107
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agentscited by 94
- 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agentscited by 82
- 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agentscited by 76
- 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agentscited by 65
- 2026STALE: Can LLM Agents Know When Their Memories Are No Longer Valid?cited by 50
- 2025PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistantscited by 48
- 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistantscited by 37
- 2024CI-Bench: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity of AI Assistants on Synthetic Datacited by 37
- 2025Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networkscited by 36
- 2025DarkBench: Benchmarking Dark Patterns in Large Language Modelscited by 28
- 2026HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark): Do Agents Know When to Ask for Help?cited by 27
- 2025iAgent: LLM Agent as a Shield between User and Recommender Systemscited by 23
- 2025What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commercecited by 22
- 2026KnowU-Bench: Towards Interactive, Proactive, and Personalized Mobile Agent Evaluationcited by 21
- 2025Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Marketscited by 19
- 2025Investigating the Impact of Dark Patterns on LLM-Based Web Agentscited by 17
- 2026HorizonBench: Long-Horizon Personalization with Evolving Preferencescited by 17
- 2025Dark Patterns Meet GUI Agents: LLM Agent Susceptibility to Manipulative Interfaces and the Role of Human Oversightcited by 16
- 2025ConVerse: Benchmarking Contextual Safety in Agent-to-Agent Conversationscited by 16
- 2025Are Your Agents Upward Deceivers?cited by 16
- 2025DECEPTICON: How Dark Patterns Manipulate Web Agentscited by 15
- 2026ASTRA-bench: Evaluating Tool-Use Agent Reasoning and Action Planning with Personal User Contextcited by 14
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.