mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentSCOPE: Evaluating Contextual Privacy Across Agentic Workflows

arXiv 2603.04902 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic systems are increasingly acting on users' behalf, accessing calendars, email, and personal files to complete everyday tasks. Privacy evaluation for these systems has focused on the input and output boundaries, but each task involves several intermediate information flows, from agent queries to tool responses, that are not currently evaluated. We argue that every boundary in an agentic pipeline is a site of potential privacy violation and must be assessed independently. To support this, we introduce the Privacy Flow Graph, a Contextual Integrity-grounded framework that decomposes agentic execution into a sequence of information flows, each annotated with the five CI parameters, and traces violations to their point of origin. We present AgentSCOPE, a benchmark of 62 multi-tool scenarios across eight regulatory domains with ground truth at every pipeline stage. Our evaluation across seven state-of-the-art LLMs show that privacy violations in the pipeline occur in over 80% of scenarios, even when final outputs appear clean (24%), with most violations arising at the tool-response stage where APIs return sensitive data indiscriminately. These results indicate that output-level evaluation alone substantially underestimates the privacy risk of agentic systems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 6 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
  2. 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents22 Feb

Other references · 2

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 161

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems
  2. 2026CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents
  3. 2026From Privacy to Workflow Integrity: Communication-Graph Metadata in Autonomous Agent Interoperability
  4. 2026AgentPrivArena: Evaluating and Auditing Real-world AI Agent Privacy
  5. 2026ToolPrivacyBench: Benchmarking Purpose-Bound Privacy in Tool-Using LLM Agents
  6. 2026PAPC: Platform Mediation for Privacy-Propagation Externalities in AI-Mediated Workflows
  7. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning
  8. 2025Privacy Reasoning in Ambiguous Contexts