It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs
On the map: Knowledge distillation → On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
Contextual Integrity (CI) defines privacy not merely as keeping information hidden, but as governing information flows according to the norms of a given context. As large language models are increasingly deployed as personal agents handling sensitive workflows, adhering to CI becomes critical. However, even frontier models remain unreliable in making disclosure decisions, and existing mitigation strategies often degrade underlying task performance. To overcome this privacy-utility trade-off, we propose SELFCI, a complementary self-distillation framework that decouples information suppression from task resolution. SELFCI jointly optimizes two independent reverse KL divergences over distinct teacher distributions derived from feedback: one encourages preserving task-relevant information for utility, while the other enforces minimal and appropriate disclosure. This complementary formulation induces a Product-of-Experts (PoE) target, aligning the policy with the intersection of capability and privacy requirements. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that SELFCI, without relying on costly external supervision, consistently outperforms competitive baselines such as online reinforcement learning algorithms (e.g., GRPO). These trends further extend to out-of-domain settings involving agentic workflows and accumulated private context, suggesting that SELFCI provides a practical path toward CI alignment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 37 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
37 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation28 Jan
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning27 Jan
- 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models26 Jan
Other references · 34
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
- 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
22 more
- 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 260
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
- 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
- 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 138
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agentscited by 94
- 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agentscited by 82
- 2024GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 37
- 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistantscited by 37
- 2024CI-Bench: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity of AI Assistants on Synthetic Datacited by 37
- 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 37
- 2025Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networkscited by 36
- 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agentscited by 36
- 2025MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocolcited by 34
- 2025Contextual Integrity in LLMs via Reasoning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
- 2024Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 18
- 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoningcited by 17
- 2025PrivacyBench: A Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Privacy in Personalized AIcited by 12
- 2026THINKSAFE: Self-Generated Safety Alignment for Reasoning Modelscited by 10
- 2025Context Reasoner: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability for Contextualized Privacy and Safety Compliance via Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2026Chain-of-Sanitized-Thoughts: Plugging PII Leakage in CoT of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 5
- 2026MPCI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Pairwise Contextual Integrity Evaluation of Language Model Agentscited by 2
- 2026PrivacyReasoner: Can LLM Emulate a Human-like Privacy Mind?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference Training
- 2026PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems
- 2026Need to Know: Contextual-Integrity-Grounded Query Rewriting for Privacy-Conscious LLM Delegation
- 2025Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Reinforcing privacy reasoning in LLMs via normative simulacra from fiction
- 2026Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents
- 2026AgentCIScope: Grounded Contextual Integrity Evaluation for LLM Agents
- 2026CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents