mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TACO: Tool-Augmented Credit Optimization for Agentic Tool Use

arXiv 2606.30251 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.MAcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic multimodal models perform diverse operations on an image via code and reason over the returned view, an effective paradigm for fine-grained visual question answering. However, code operations can be useful, redundant, or misleading. Outcome-only rewards cannot precisely distinguish these cases, and existing process rewards either fail to attribute final correctness to individual tool calls, or require an external judge model. To address this, we introduce Tool-Augmented Credit Optimization (TACO), a GRPO variant for code-tool agents built on two coupled advantage channels. The first, Differential Answer-Probe Reward (DAPR), is a self-supervised, judge-free tool-contribution advantage that credits each tool call by its own effect on answering correctly. Probe tokens inserted into the model's reasoning elicit its predictions with and without the tool, and the difference in outcome reward is taken as the call's value: positive for a useful call, negative for a misleading one, and zero for one that changes nothing. This reuses the existing answer checker with no auxiliary judge, and, being a difference rather than an absolute probe score, is naturally robust to probe-hacking. The second is the outcome advantage from the final answer, distributed by Outcome-Gated Advantage Routing (OGAR): a parameter-free rule that, conditioned on the call's outcome, delivers this credit only to the responsible segments, suppressing wasted tool calls without any cost term. We train TACO through a two-stage SFT+RL pipeline. Extensive experiments across perception, reasoning, and general multimodal benchmarks show that it yields consistent accuracy gains and learns to invoke its tools only when they help.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

36 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026PyVision-RL: Forging Open Agentic Vision Models via RL24 Feb
  2. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence2 Feb
  3. 2025Agent0-VL: Exploring Self-Evolving Agent for Tool-Integrated Vision-Language Reasoning25 Nov
  4. 2025CodeV: Code with Images for Faithful Visual Reasoning via Tool-Aware Policy Optimization24 Nov

Other references · 32

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  3. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  4. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
  5. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  6. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  7. 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
  8. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 550
  9. 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Datasetcited by 526
  10. 2023V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMscited by 482
  11. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  12. 2024MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?cited by 292
20 more
  1. 2024We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?cited by 286
  2. 2025Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  3. 2024LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contextscited by 245
  4. 2025Mini-o3: Scaling Up Reasoning Patterns and Interaction Turns for Visual Searchcited by 120
  5. 2025Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Fine-Grained Reward Structure and Credit Assignmentcited by 79
  6. 2025MathCoder-VL: Bridging Vision and Code for Enhanced Multimodal Mathematical Reasoningcited by 45
  7. 2025TemplateRL: Structured Template-Guided Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 28
  8. 2025AStar: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with Automated Structured Thinkingcited by 25
  9. 2026Act Wisely: Cultivating Meta-Cognitive Tool Use in Agentic Multimodal Modelscited by 14
  10. 2025RadialRouter: Structured Representation for Efficient and Robust Large Language Models Routingcited by 11
  11. 2025PACR: Progressively Ascending Confidence Reward for LLM Reasoningcited by 9
  12. 2026Step Potential Advantage Estimation: Harnessing Intermediate Confidence and Correctness for Efficient Mathematical Reasoningcited by 9
  13. 2026Exploring Knowledge Purification in Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation for LLMscited by 9
  14. 2026PatchCue: Enhancing Vision-Language Model Reasoning with Patch-Based Visual Cuescited by 8
  15. 2026HISR: Hindsight Information Modulated Segmental Process Rewards For Multi-turn Agentic Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  16. 2025Better, Stronger, Faster: Tackling the Trilemma in MLLM-based Segmentation with Simultaneous Textual Mask Predictioncited by 7
  17. 2026Zoom Consistency: A Free Confidence Signal in Multi-Step Visual Grounding Pipelinescited by 4
  18. 2026Self-Induced Outcome Potential: Turn-Level Credit Assignment for Agents without Verifierscited by 4
  19. 2025Two-Stage Regularization-Based Structured Pruning for LLMscited by 3
  20. 2026Discovering Process-Outcome Credit in Multi-Step LLM Reasoningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Self-Evolving Visual Agent via Margin Reward
  2. 2026LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger
  3. 2026Do Multimodal Agents Really Benefit from Tool Use? A Systematic Study of Capability Gains
  4. 2026ATP-Bench: Towards Agentic Tool Planning for MLLM Interleaved Generation
  5. 2026FaithEyes: Towards Faithful Tool Use via Multi-Agent Process-Image Verification
  6. 2026IAPO: Input Attribution-Aware Policy Optimization for Tool Use in Small Multimodal Agents
  7. 2026LiteSearch-VL: Small Multimodal Search Agents via Trajectory Distillation and Synthetic Step-DPO
  8. 2026Making Every Tool Call Count: Necessary Tool-Evidence Path Rewards for Agentic Vision-Language Models