mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger

arXiv 2607.28374 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal agents for visual question answering increasingly operate as multi-step trajectories that interleave perception, retrieval, and reasoning, yet evaluation still largely reduces to final-answer accuracy. This aggregate signal cannot tell whether a correct answer was reached through grounded evidence, language priors, or accidental error cancellation. We propose to treat a multimodal agent trajectory as a provenance-constrained state machine: tool outputs are normalized into a Structured Evidence Ledger that serves as the trajectory state, downstream reasoning and decision claims may cite only active ledger entries, grounding is checked at the entity and numeric level, and repair is realized as typed state transitions that cannot introduce content without tool-produced provenance. We instantiate this design as LedgerMind (Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger), augmented by a Three-Layer Grounding Protocol, an Adaptive Dual-Path Dispatcher that matches reasoning depth to question complexity, and an Event-Triggered Verification-and-Repair engine with a formal provenance non-amplification guarantee. We use LedgerMind to target four recurring failure patterns that final-answer accuracy tends to obscure: unsupported intermediate reasoning, citation-backed entity hallucination (Phantom Grounding), over-reasoning on simple queries, and repair-time amplification. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks and backbone MLLMs show that LedgerMind improves both answer accuracy and trajectory-level faithfulness.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 47 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

47 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Octopus: Agentic Multimodal Reasoning with Six-Capability Orchestration19 Nov
  2. 2025TIR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Agentic Thinking-with-Images Reasoning3 Nov
  3. 2025MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency13 Feb
  4. 2025Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark9 Jan
  5. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning14 Mar

Other references · 42

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  8. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  9. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  10. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  11. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
  12. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
30 more
  1. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  2. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  3. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  4. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
  5. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
  6. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  7. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 564
  8. 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
  9. 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocationcited by 468
  10. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 456
  11. 2024Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 380
  12. 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 352
  13. 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
  14. 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 297
  15. 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 285
  16. 2023Woodpecker: Hallucination Correction for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 223
  17. 2024On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Taskscited by 137
  18. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
  19. 2025Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMscited by 115
  20. 2025WebWatcher: Breaking New Frontier of Vision-Language Deep Research Agentcited by 114
  21. 2024Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinementcited by 111
  22. 2025Don't Overthink it. Preferring Shorter Thinking Chains for Improved LLM Reasoningcited by 82
  23. 2025SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agentscited by 66
  24. 2024Correctness is not Faithfulness in RAG Attributionscited by 18
  25. 2025GraphMaster: Automated Graph Synthesis via LLM Agents in Data-Limited Environmentscited by 18
  26. 2026VTC-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Multimodal Models via Compositional Visual Tool Chainingcited by 12
  27. 2026MC-Search: Evaluating and Enhancing Multimodal Agentic Search with Structured Long Reasoning Chainscited by 11
  28. 2025VideoSeg-R1:Reasoning Video Object Segmentation via Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  29. 2026Claim-Level Rubric Rewards for Video Caption Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  30. 2025Decoupling Continual Semantic Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Seeing and Reasoning with Confidence: Supercharging Multimodal LLMs with an Uncertainty-Aware Agentic Framework
  2. 2026V-Retrver: Evidence-Driven Agentic Reasoning for Universal Multimodal Retrieval
  3. 2026MemEye: A Visual-Centric Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Agent Memory
  4. 2025CoRGI: Verified Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Post-hoc Visual Grounding
  5. 2025SeeingEye: Agentic Information Flow Unlocks Multimodal Reasoning In Text-only LLMs
  6. 2026TRACER: Verifiable Generative Provenance for Multimodal Tool-Using Agents
  7. 2026Knowing When Not to Answer: Evaluating Abstention in Multimodal Reasoning Systems
  8. 2026PMMC: Prospective Multimodal Memory Compilation for Long-Term LVLM Agents