mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Exploration Networks

arXiv 2308.13049 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian reinforcement learning (RL) offers a principled and elegant approach for sequential decision making under uncertainty. Most notably, Bayesian agents do not face an exploration/exploitation dilemma, a major pathology of frequentist methods. However theoretical understanding of model-free approaches is lacking. In this paper, we introduce a novel Bayesian model-free formulation and the first analysis showing that model-free approaches can yield Bayes-optimal policies. We show all existing model-free approaches make approximations that yield policies that can be arbitrarily Bayes-suboptimal. As a first step towards model-free Bayes optimality, we introduce the Bayesian exploration network (BEN) which uses normalising flows to model both the aleatoric uncertainty (via density estimation) and epistemic uncertainty (via variational inference) in the Bellman operator. In the limit of complete optimisation, BEN learns true Bayes-optimal policies, but like in variational expectation-maximisation, partial optimisation renders our approach tractable. Empirical results demonstrate that BEN can learn true Bayes-optimal policies in tasks where existing model-free approaches fail.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2023.

Builds on

31 of 66 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  5. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  6. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  7. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
  8. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  9. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  10. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  11. 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 262
  12. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
19 more
  1. 2018Randomized Prior Functions for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 218
  2. 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 213
  3. 2019VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learningcited by 210
  4. 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 207
  5. 2017Deep Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 155
  6. 2023A Tutorial on Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
  7. 2019Better Exploration with Optimistic Actor-Criticcited by 88
  8. 2017The Uncertainty Bellman Equation and Explorationcited by 81
  9. 2020SurVAE Flows: Surjections to Bridge the Gap between VAEs and Flowscited by 71
  10. 2020Improving Generalization in Meta-learning via Task Augmentationcited by 55
  11. 2018Successor Uncertainties: Exploration and Uncertainty in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 35
  12. 2017BBQ-Networks: Efficient Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 30
  13. 2020Exploration in Approximate Hyper-State Space for Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  14. 2021Bayesian Bellman Operatorscited by 16
  15. 2018Randomized Value Functions via Multiplicative Normalizing Flowscited by 15
  16. 2023Model-Based Uncertainty in Value Functionscited by 15
  17. 2023Why Target Networks Stabilise Temporal Difference Methodscited by 13
  18. 2023Minimax-Bayes Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  19. 2023Exploration via Epistemic Value Estimationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.