mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combating noisy labels in object detection datasets

arXiv 2211.13993 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quality of training datasets for deep neural networks is a key factor contributing to the accuracy of resulting models. This effect is amplified in difficult tasks such as object detection. Dealing with errors in datasets is often limited to accepting that some fraction of examples are incorrect, estimating their confidence, and either assigning appropriate weights or ignoring uncertain ones during training. In this work, we propose a different approach. We introduce the Confident Learning for Object Detection (CLOD) algorithm for assessing the quality of each label in object detection datasets, identifying missing, spurious, mislabeled, and mislocated bounding boxes and suggesting corrections. By focusing on finding incorrect examples in the training datasets, we can eliminate them at the root. Suspicious bounding boxes can be reviewed to improve the quality of the dataset, leading to better models without further complicating their already complex architectures. The proposed method is able to point out nearly 80% of artificially disturbed bounding boxes with a false positive rate below 0.1. Cleaning the datasets by applying the most confident automatic suggestions improved mAP scores by 16% to 46%, depending on the dataset, without any modifications to the network architectures. This approach shows promising potential in rectifying state-of-the-art object detection datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.

Builds on

20 of 49 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  4. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  5. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  7. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  8. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  9. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  10. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
8 more
  1. 2017Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithmscited by 60
  2. 2020Safety Concerns and Mitigation Approaches Regarding the Use of Deep Learning in Safety-Critical Perception Taskscited by 31
  3. 2020Towards Noise-resistant Object Detection with Noisy Annotationscited by 24
  4. 2022Towards Robust Adaptive Object Detection under Noisy Annotationscited by 20
  5. 2019Training Object Detectors With Noisy Datacited by 19
  6. 2013An Empirical Study into Annotator Agreement, Ground Truth Estimation, and Algorithm Evaluationcited by 15
  7. 2021Noisy Annotation Refinement for Object Detectioncited by 9
  8. 2022Narrowing the Gap: Improved Detector Training with Noisy Location Annotationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.