mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Identifying Mislabeled Instances in Classification Datasets

arXiv 1912.05283 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A key requirement for supervised machine learning is labeled training data, which is created by annotating unlabeled data with the appropriate class. Because this process can in many cases not be done by machines, labeling needs to be performed by human domain experts. This process tends to be expensive both in time and money, and is prone to errors. Additionally, reviewing an entire labeled dataset manually is often prohibitively costly, so many real world datasets contain mislabeled instances. To address this issue, we present in this paper a non-parametric end-to-end pipeline to find mislabeled instances in numerical, image and natural language datasets. We evaluate our system quantitatively by adding a small number of label noise to 29 datasets, and show that we find mislabeled instances with an average precision of more than 0.84 when reviewing our system's top 1% recommendation. We then apply our system to publicly available datasets and find mislabeled instances in CIFAR-100, Fashion-MNIST, and others. Finally, we publish the code and an applicable implementation of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleadingcited by 35
  2. 2024Why is SAM Robust to Label Noise?cited by 21
  3. 2022Detecting Label Errors by using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 16
  4. 2022Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decaycited by 13
  5. 2024The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic reviewcited by 13
  6. 2022Detecting Label Errors in Token Classification Datacited by 12
  7. 2022Identifying Incorrect Annotations in Multi-Label Classification Datacited by 12
  8. 2023Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any modelcited by 12
  9. 2023ObjectLab: Automated Diagnosis of Mislabeled Images in Object Detection Datacited by 11
  10. 2024Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Modelscited by 10
  11. 2022Efficient Adversarial Training With Data Pruningcited by 7
  12. 2024Active Label Correction for Semantic Segmentation with Foundation Modelscited by 7
14 more
  1. 2022Learning Sample Reweighting for Accuracy and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 6
  2. 2021Assessing the Quality of the Datasets by Identifying Mislabeled Samplescited by 5
  3. 2023Gradient-Based Automated Iterative Recovery for Parameter-Efficient Tuningcited by 5
  4. 2023Towards understanding neural collapse in supervised contrastive learning with the information bottleneck methodcited by 5
  5. 2023On Evaluation of Document Classification using RVL-CDIPcited by 5
  6. 2021Training Dynamic based data filtering may not work for NLP datasetscited by 3
  7. 2025GenColor: Generative Color-Concept Association in Visual Designcited by 3
  8. 2022Identify ambiguous tasks combining crowdsourced labels by weighting Areas Under the Margincited by 1
  9. 2021Defending Against Adversarial Denial-of-Service Data Poisoning Attackscited by 0
  10. 2023Detecting Errors in a Numerical Response via any Regression Modelcited by 0
  11. 2025Learning to Detect Label Errors by Making Them: A Method for Segmentation and Object Detection Datasetscited by 0
  12. 2026An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibrationcited by 0
  13. 2026Analyzing Training-Free Corruption Detection for Object Detection Datasetscited by 0
  14. 2026Revising RVL-CDIP: Quantifying Errors and Test-Train Overlapcited by 0