mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.17107 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a key post-pretraining step for aligning large language models (LLMs) with complex tasks and human preferences. While it is often assumed that RL fine-tuning requires updating most of a model's parameters, we challenge this assumption with a surprising finding: RL fine-tuning consistently modifies only a small subnetwork (typically 5-30% of weights), leaving most parameters unchanged. We call this phenomenon RL-induced parameter update sparsity. It arises naturally, without any sparsity constraints or parameter-efficient tuning, and appears across multiple RL algorithms (e.g., PPO, DPO, SimPO, PRIME) and model families (e.g., OpenAI, Meta, and open-source LLMs). Moreover, the subnetworks updated by RL show substantial overlap across different seeds, datasets, and algorithms-far exceeding chance-suggesting a partially transferable structure in the pretrained model. We show that fine-tuning only this sparse subnetwork recovers full model performance and yields parameters nearly identical to the fully fine-tuned model. Our analysis suggests this sparsity emerges because RL operates near the model's original distribution, requiring only targeted changes. KL penalties, gradient clipping, and on-policy dynamics have limited effect on the sparsity pattern. These findings shed new light on how RL adapts models: not by shifting all weights, but by focusing training on a small, consistently updated subnetwork. This insight enables more efficient RL methods and reframes sparsity through the lens of the lottery ticket hypothesis.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2025.

Builds on

52 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback15 Mar
  2. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  4. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep

Other references · 47

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  8. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  9. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  10. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  11. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  12. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
35 more
  1. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  2. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  3. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
  4. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  5. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  6. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
  7. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
  8. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  9. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
  10. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  11. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 511
  12. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
  13. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 504
  14. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  15. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
  16. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 246
  17. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  18. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
  19. 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 145
  20. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 108
  21. 2023Task-Specific Skill Localization in Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 105
  22. 2024LISA: Layerwise Importance Sampling for Memory-Efficient Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 89
  23. 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimalcited by 84
  24. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
  25. 2022The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
  26. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 52
  27. 2021Dynamic Sparse Training for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
  28. 2021From LSAT: The Progress and Challenges of Complex Reasoningcited by 43
  29. 2024Lottery Ticket Adaptation: Mitigating Destructive Interference in LLMscited by 31
  30. 2022RLx2: Training a Sparse Deep Reinforcement Learning Model from Scratchcited by 30
  31. 2022Coarsening the Granularity: Towards Structurally Sparse Lottery Ticketscited by 27
  32. 2024One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualizationcited by 24
  33. 2023Discovering Knowledge-Critical Subnetworks in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 16
  34. 2022A Win-win Deal: Towards Sparse and Robust Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 7
  35. 2025On the Interplay Between Sparsity and Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Models
  2. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
  3. 2025On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language Models
  4. 2026Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Training
  5. 2025The Path Not Taken: RLVR Provably Learns Off the Principals
  6. 2025RAPID: An Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Small Language Models
  7. 2026When RL Fails after SFT: Rejuvenating Model Plasticity for Robust SFT-to-RL Handoff
  8. 2026Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMs