Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a key post-pretraining step for aligning large language models (LLMs) with complex tasks and human preferences. While it is often assumed that RL fine-tuning requires updating most of a model's parameters, we challenge this assumption with a surprising finding: RL fine-tuning consistently modifies only a small subnetwork (typically 5-30% of weights), leaving most parameters unchanged. We call this phenomenon RL-induced parameter update sparsity. It arises naturally, without any sparsity constraints or parameter-efficient tuning, and appears across multiple RL algorithms (e.g., PPO, DPO, SimPO, PRIME) and model families (e.g., OpenAI, Meta, and open-source LLMs). Moreover, the subnetworks updated by RL show substantial overlap across different seeds, datasets, and algorithms-far exceeding chance-suggesting a partially transferable structure in the pretrained model. We show that fine-tuning only this sparse subnetwork recovers full model performance and yields parameters nearly identical to the fully fine-tuned model. Our analysis suggests this sparsity emerges because RL operates near the model's original distribution, requiring only targeted changes. KL penalties, gradient clipping, and on-policy dynamics have limited effect on the sparsity pattern. These findings shed new light on how RL adapts models: not by shifting all weights, but by focusing training on a small, consistently updated subnetwork. This insight enables more efficient RL methods and reframes sparsity through the lens of the lottery ticket hypothesis.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2025.
Builds on
52 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback15 Mar
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
Other references · 47
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
35 more
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 511
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 504
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 246
- 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
- 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
- 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 145
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 108
- 2023Task-Specific Skill Localization in Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 105
- 2024LISA: Layerwise Importance Sampling for Memory-Efficient Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 89
- 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimalcited by 84
- 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
- 2022The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
- 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 52
- 2021Dynamic Sparse Training for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
- 2021From LSAT: The Progress and Challenges of Complex Reasoningcited by 43
- 2024Lottery Ticket Adaptation: Mitigating Destructive Interference in LLMscited by 31
- 2022RLx2: Training a Sparse Deep Reinforcement Learning Model from Scratchcited by 30
- 2022Coarsening the Granularity: Towards Structurally Sparse Lottery Ticketscited by 27
- 2024One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualizationcited by 24
- 2023Discovering Knowledge-Critical Subnetworks in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 16
- 2022A Win-win Deal: Towards Sparse and Robust Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025On the Interplay Between Sparsity and Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Do Reasoning Models Enhance Embedding Models?cited by 0
- 2026Preference Tuning as Spectral Update Reorganizationcited by 0
- 2026Preference Tuning as Spectral Update Reorganization12 May 2026
- 2026Do Reasoning Models Enhance Embedding Models?29 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Models
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2025On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language Models
- 2026Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Training
- 2025The Path Not Taken: RLVR Provably Learns Off the Principals
- 2025RAPID: An Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Small Language Models
- 2026When RL Fails after SFT: Rejuvenating Model Plasticity for Robust SFT-to-RL Handoff
- 2026Sparse but Critical: A Token-Level Analysis of Distributional Shifts in RLVR Fine-Tuning of LLMs