Beyond Imitation: Recovering Dense Rewards from Demonstrations
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Conventionally, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is treated as a simple imitation learning process that only trains a policy to imitate expert behavior on demonstration datasets. In this work, we challenge this view by establishing a fundamental equivalence between SFT and Inverse Reinforcement Learning. We prove that the SFT objective is a special case of Inverse Q-Learning, which implies that the SFT process does not just learn a policy, but also an implicit, dense, token-level reward model that explains the expert demonstrations. We then show how to recover this dense reward signal directly from the SFT model by formulating a baseline-relative reward function. The availability of such a dense reward model offers numerous benefits, providing granular credit assignment for each token generated. We demonstrate one key application by using these recovered rewards to further improve the policy with reinforcement learning. Our method, Dense-Path REINFORCE, consistently outperforms the original SFT models on instruction-following benchmarks. This work reframes SFT not merely as policy imitation but as a powerful reward learning mechanism, opening new possibilities for leveraging expert demonstrations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.
Builds on
26 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Generalist Reward Models: Found Inside Large Language Models29 Jun
- 2024Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment28 May
- 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback1 Feb
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
Other references · 22
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
10 more
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
- 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 379
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
- 2021IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitationcited by 193
- 2025Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)cited by 38
- 2024Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedbackcited by 34
- 2024How to Leverage Demonstration Data in Alignment for Large Language Model? A Self-Imitation Learning Perspectivecited by 14
- 2025On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFcited by 13
- 2024Supervised Fine-Tuning as Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Versatile Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Cumulative Rewards
- 2023BC-IRL: Learning Generalizable Reward Functions from Demonstrations
- 2020f-IRL: Inverse Reinforcement Learning via State Marginal Matching
- 2018Learning a Prior over Intent via Meta-Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observations
- 2019Reward-Conditioned Policies
- 2019Meta-Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Context Variables
- 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling