Digital-to-Physical Transfer of Adversarial Patches for Aerial Vehicle Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural network (DNN)-based object detectors are widely used for analyzing aerial and satellite imagery in applications such as environmental monitoring and urban analytics. Despite their strong performance, these models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples, and physical adversarial attacks using printable patterns pose realistic security threats. In this paper, we evaluate physical adversarial patch attacks against an aerial vehicle detector by bridging digital optimization and real-world deployment. Adversarial patches are optimized in the digital domain using a loss function that minimizes the maximum objectness score while incorporating non-printability score (NPS) and total variation (TV) constraints to ensure both printability and spatial smoothness. The optimized patches are printed and deployed in three configurations: ON, OFF, and OFF-Side. Experiments using a YOLOv3 detector show that while the OFF patch achieves the highest effectiveness in the digital domain (85.51% Average Objectness Reduction Rate (AORR)), the ON patch demonstrates superior robustness in physical environments (0.197-0.343 Objectness Score Ratio (OSR)) due to its consistent visibility. Furthermore, our results indicate that weather-based augmentation does not necessarily improve patch optimization in this domain. These findings provide critical insights into the practical vulnerabilities of aerial object detection systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 31 references.
References · 25
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2019AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID systemcited by 161
- 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
13 more
- 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
- 2016A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learningcited by 86
- 2024Poly Kernel Inception Network for Remote Sensing Detectioncited by 52
- 2023DAP: A Dynamic Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectorscited by 40
- 2021Physical Adversarial Attacks on an Aerial Imagery Object Detectorcited by 35
- 2024PAD: Patch-Agnostic Defense against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 31
- 2017Using convolutional networks and satellite imagery to identify patterns in urban environments at a large scalecited by 23
- 2018Adversarial Examples in Remote Sensingcited by 19
- 2020Adversarial Patch Camouflage against Aerial Detectioncited by 16
- 2017Note on Attacking Object Detectors with Adversarial Stickerscited by 5
- 2024MutDet: Mutually Optimizing Pre-training for Remote Sensing Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2025PapMOT: Exploring Adversarial Patch Attack against Multiple Object Trackingcited by 3
- 2025Revisiting Adversarial Patch Defenses on Object Detectors: Unified Evaluation, Large-Scale Dataset, and New Insightscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.