mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leave a Window Out: Modifying the Jackknife for Predictive Inference in Time Series

arXiv 2605.30292 ↗First posted 28 May 2026stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conformal prediction methods enjoy strong theoretical and empirical predictive inference performance, provided the data is exchangeable and is treated symmetrically during training. However, these assumptions are impractical in many settings, such as time series, where temporal dependence violates exchangeability and it is preferable to use predictors that leverage dependence by treating data asymmetrically. Recent work shows that split conformal prediction is robust to these issues, but sample splitting can reduce accuracy, motivating the study of methods that do not rely on data splitting in the time series setting. In this work, we show that the vanilla leave-one-out jackknife can suffer arbitrary loss of coverage even in canonical time series models with mild temporal dependence. As a remedy, we propose a modification tailored to such settings, which we term the leave-a-window-out (LWO) method, and show that it can achieve valid coverage provided that the model-fitting procedure satisfies mild stability properties. Our proofs are based on quantifying the degree to which the data departs from cyclic exchangeability, which we introduce new coefficients to measure. Experiments on time series demonstrate that our method often enjoys valid coverage when the vanilla jackknife fails to cover, while producing much narrower intervals than split conformal prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 57 references.

References · 31

  1. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
  2. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  3. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
  4. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 375
  5. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 355
  6. 2019Financial Time Series Forecasting with Deep Learning : A Systematic Literature Review: 2005-2019cited by 273
  7. 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
  8. 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 211
  9. 2022Adaptive Conformal Predictions for Time Seriescited by 161
  10. 2022Conformal Inference for Online Prediction with Arbitrary Distribution Shiftscited by 128
  11. 2019Distributional conformal predictioncited by 105
  12. 2021Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shiftcited by 101
19 more
  1. 2024Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Predictioncited by 101
  2. 2019Nested conformal prediction and quantile out-of-bag ensemble methodscited by 89
  3. 2023Conformal PID Control for Time Series Predictioncited by 88
  4. 2022Sequential Predictive Conformal Inference for Time Seriescited by 75
  5. 2018Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Methods for Predictive Machine Learning With Dependent Datacited by 66
  6. 2020Predictive Inference Is Free with the Jackknife+-after-Bootstrapcited by 55
  7. 2024Conformal prediction for multi-dimensional time series by ellipsoidal setscited by 37
  8. 2024Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution (and How to Find Them)cited by 26
  9. 2022Split Localized Conformal Predictioncited by 23
  10. 2021Multi Split Conformal Predictioncited by 21
  11. 2021Stable Conformal Prediction Setscited by 19
  12. 2023Bagging Provides Assumption-free Stabilitycited by 19
  13. 2024Kernel-based Optimally Weighted Conformal Time-Series Predictioncited by 15
  14. 2025Predictive inference for time series: why is split conformal effective despite temporal dependence?cited by 10
  15. 2022Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chainscited by 8
  16. 2024Spatial Conformal Inference through Localized Quantile Regressioncited by 6
  17. 2024Just Wing It: Near-Optimal Estimation of Missing Mass in a Markovian Sequencecited by 5
  18. 2024Conformal Predictions under Markovian Datacited by 4
  19. 2025Estimating stationary mass, frequency by frequencycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.