Sequential statistical inference for Large Language Models: Representation, validity, and monitoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This discussion argues that sequential statistical inference can naturally contribute to LLM trustworthiness. In deployment, LLM systems are queried repeatedly, conditioned on evolving contexts, and incorporate user or tool feedback, and may exhibit behavioral shifts after model updates or distribution changes. The discussion is organized around three tasks: representation, modeling LLM interactions as dependent stochastic processes rather than isolated prompt--response pairs; validity, developing uncertainty guarantees that remain meaningful under dependence, repeated use, and adaptation; and monitoring, using sequential alarms and change-point detection to identify shifts in calibration, hallucination rates, refusal behavior, fairness, or other task-relevant properties. This perspective complements recent surveys by viewing trustworthy LLM deployment as a problem of statistical process control.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
7 of 13 references.
References · 7
- 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 229
- 2022Conformal Inference for Online Prediction with Arbitrary Distribution Shiftscited by 128
- 2025An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticianscited by 24
- 2023Generalized generalized linear models: Convex estimation and online boundscited by 6
- 2026Leave a Window Out: Modifying the Jackknife for Predictive Inference in Time Seriescited by 4
- 2024Nonlinear time-series embedding by monotone variational inequalitycited by 2
- 2026Control Charts for Multi-agent Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.