From Model Scaling to System Scaling: Scaling the Harness in Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies the next major bottleneck in agentic AI as system scaling, not only model scaling: the design of auditable, persistent, modular, and verifiable architectures around foundation models. We refer to this shift as scaling the harness: treating the structured execution layer around a foundation model as a first-class object of design, evaluation, and optimization. Although recent large language models enable agents to use tools, retrieve information, maintain memory, and execute long-horizon workflows, evaluation remains largely model-centric, often reducing agents to final-task success while treating memory, retrieval, tool use, orchestration, verification, and governance as secondary implementation details. This framing is increasingly inadequate because agent performance emerges from the interaction among the foundation model, memory substrate, context constructor, skill-routing layer, orchestration loop, and verification-and-governance layer. Together, these components form the agent harness, which translates model capability into long-horizon agent behavior. We study scaling the harness through three core bottlenecks: context governance, trustworthy memory, and dynamic skill routing, together with the orchestration and governance mechanisms that coordinate and constrain them. We further outline a research agenda for harness-level benchmarks that go beyond one-shot task success to measure trajectory quality, memory hygiene, context efficiency, communication fidelity, verification cost, and safe evolution over time. To make the discussion concrete, we develop CheetahClaws: https://github.com/SafeRL-Lab/cheetahclaws, a Python-native reference harness, and compare it with Claude Code and OpenClaw. Our main claim is that future progress in agentic AI will depend as much on system design as on stronger foundation models.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Understanding Agent Scaling in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems via Diversity3 Feb
- 2025X-MAS: Towards Building Multi-Agent Systems with Heterogeneous LLMs22 May
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey14 Sep
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar
Other references · 23
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
11 more
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
- 2025Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agentscited by 43
- 2026Code as Agent Harnesscited by 40
- 2026AgenticPay: A Multi-Agent LLM Negotiation System for Buyer-Seller Transactionscited by 11
- 2026LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitlycited by 6
- 2026Long Context, Less Focus: A Scaling Gap in LLMs Revealed through Privacy and Personalizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Recursive Harness Self-Improvementcited by 22
- 2026Understanding and Evaluating Claw-like Agent Security Through a Computer-Systems Lenscited by 5
- 2026Harness Continual Learning: Continual Adaptation Beyond Model Parameterscited by 2
- 2026The Harness Effect: How Orchestration Design Sets the Token Economics of Enterprise Agentic AIcited by 1
- 2026EvoHarnessBench: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?cited by 1
- 2026Distributing Security Controls Through Harness Engineeringcited by 0
- 2026StateM: Reaching 95.3% Raw Accuracy, or a 15 Frontier Run, on Terminal-Bench 2.1 via Harness Scalingcited by 0
- 2026A Contract-Centered Architecture for Scalable and Manageable Agentic Runtimescited by 0
- 2026EvoHarnessBench: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness?3 Sep 2026
- 2026A Contract-Centered Architecture for Scalable and Manageable Agentic Runtimes27 Aug 2026
- 2026Harness Continual Learning: Continual Adaptation Beyond Model Parameters19 Aug 2026
- 2026StateM: Reaching 95.3% Raw Accuracy, or a 15 Frontier Run, on Terminal-Bench 2.1 via Harness Scaling15 Aug 2026
- 2026Distributing Security Controls Through Harness Engineering28 Jul 2026
- 2026Recursive Harness Self-Improvement17 Jul 2026
- 2026The Harness Effect: How Orchestration Design Sets the Token Economics of Enterprise Agentic AI8 Jul 2026
- 2026Understanding and Evaluating Claw-like Agent Security Through a Computer-Systems Lens29 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems
- 2026Apodex 1.1: Scaling Agentic Intelligence for Complex Work
- 2025AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise
- 2026Hive: A Multi-Agent Infrastructure for Algorithm- and Task-Level Scaling
- 2026Grounded Scaling: Why Agentic AI Needs Deterministic Environments
- 2026Harness Engineering for Predictable Agentic Systems: An Empirical Study of Deterministic Execution Constraints
- 2026The Empire, Long Divided, Must Unite: Architectural Convergence in Three LLM Agent Harnesses
- 2026Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security