mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentHijack: Benchmarking Computer Use Agent Robustness to Common Environment Corruptions

arXiv 2605.25707 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous computer use agents that powered by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are emerging as capable assistants for completing complex digital workflows. However, real-world execution environments are far from ideal: pop-ups, resolution changes, and competing applications frequently interfere with agent perception and control. We introduce AgentHijack, a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of computer-use agents under common corruptions, where the uncertainties in dynamic environment disrupt the execution flow without direct adversarial intent. Specifically, AgentHijack introduces 9 configurable common corruptions to replicate realistic imperfect scenarios. We evaluate a variety of desktop tasks that utilize MLLM-based agents and discover that even minor instances of corruption can result in substantial performance degradation, which emphasizes the fragility of agents and underscores the necessity of robustness evaluation. Afterward, we propose AgentHijack-Agent, a framework that integrates an action generator with enhanced grounding capabilities and an onlooker responsible for behavior summarization and environment checking. Extensive experiments validate its effectiveness. Our code, environment, baseline models and data are publicly available at: https://AgentHijack.github.io.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

30 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025RiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use Agents31 May
  2. 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks22 Apr
  3. 2025SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents6 Mar
  4. 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents19 Dec
  5. 2024Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups4 Nov
  6. 2024ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents9 Oct
  7. 2024Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents18 Jun
  8. 2024R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agents18 Jan

Other references · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  5. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  6. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
  7. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  8. 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 692
  9. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 584
  10. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 553
  11. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 450
  12. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
10 more
  1. 2024ShowUI: One Vision-Language-Action Model for GUI Visual Agentcited by 226
  2. 2025UI-TARS-2 Technical Report: Advancing GUI Agent with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 205
  3. 2024Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Humancited by 182
  4. 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Surveycited by 173
  5. 2025ARPO:End-to-End Policy Optimization for GUI Agents with Experience Replaycited by 75
  6. 2024ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learningcited by 61
  7. 2024Caution for the Environment: Multimodal LLM Agents are Susceptible to Environmental Distractionscited by 55
  8. 2024MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Controlcited by 49
  9. 2024AgentStore: Scalable Integration of Heterogeneous Agents As Specialized Generalist Computer Assistantcited by 27
  10. 2025GUI-Robust: A Comprehensive Dataset for Testing GUI Agent Robustness in Real-World Anomaliescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety
  2. 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents
  3. 2026Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack
  4. 2026AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Condition
  5. 2026When Simulation Lies: A Sim-to-Real Benchmark and Domain-Randomized RL Recipe for Tool-Use Agents
  6. 2026AgentHazard: A Benchmark for Evaluating Harmful Behavior in Computer-Use Agents
  7. 2024Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at Scale
  8. 2026MalSkillBench: A Runtime-Verified Benchmark of Malicious Agent Skills