mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOAE: Multi-Objective Agent Evolution with Pareto-Preserving Search

arXiv 2609.05992 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLM-based agents continue to advance, their evaluation has become increasingly multifaceted: a capable agent must not only achieve high task completion accuracy but also perform well in interaction quality, safety, and efficiency, raising a central question: can these objectives be optimized simultaneously? Existing methods have considered multiple objectives, but many collapse heterogeneous measurements into a fixed scalar score. Such scalarization depends on metric normalization and preference weights and may discard candidates that represent useful deployment trade-offs. We introduce Multi-Objective Agent Evolution (MOAE), which organizes iterative in-context refinement as a Pareto-preserving evolutionary search over complete agent rollouts. Given a limited rollout budget, MOAE maintains an empirical archive of non-dominated candidates, uses objective-specific diagnostics to guide offspring generation, and applies constraint-aware selection only at deployment. This separates candidate preservation during search from the preference used to return a final solution. The procedure requires no parameter updates and allows each objective to be replaced by any measurable property, which we instantiate as task performance, trajectory quality, and safety. Experiments on TravelPlanner and AgentDojo show that MOAE consistently improves task performance and trajectory quality while maintaining strong safety under matched rollout budgets. Search-behavior analysis further shows that Pareto preservation expands the attainable objective region and increases the frequency of joint improvement. These results demonstrate the potential of Pareto-preserving in-context evolution for optimizing multiple agent properties without committing to a fixed scalarization during search.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AgentBreeder: Mitigating the AI Safety Risks of Multi-Agent Scaffolds via Self-Improvement2 Feb
  2. 2024EvoAgent: Towards Automatic Multi-Agent Generation via Evolutionary Algorithms20 Jun
  3. 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents2 Feb
  4. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan

Other references · 12

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  3. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  4. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  5. 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 270
  6. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMscited by 78
  7. 2024Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Modelscited by 27
  8. 2026SkillMOO: Multi-Objective Optimization of Agent Skills for Software Engineeringcited by 14
  9. 2025Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scalingcited by 9
  10. 2025From Long to Lean: Performance-aware and Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Compression via Multi-round Refinementcited by 2
  11. 2026Towards Pareto-Optimal Tool-Integrated Agents with Pareto Ranking Policy Optimizationcited by 2
  12. 2026MOCHA: Multi-Objective Chebyshev Annealing for Agent Skill Optimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OptiMAS: Automatically Optimize Multi-Agent System
  2. 2026RoboPhD: Evolving Diverse Complex Agents Under Tight Evaluation Budgets
  3. 2026Rethinking Self-Evolving Agents: Do We Still Need Prescribed Optimization Pipelines?
  4. 2026Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026Rethinking the Evaluation of Harness Evolution for Agents
  6. 2026DarwinX: Evolving Agent Harnesses Through Natural Selection
  7. 2025SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agents
  8. 2026At Equal Inference Cost, Multi-Agent Structure Does Not Beat a Single Frozen Agent