mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Not What You Asked For: Typographic Attacks in Household Robot Manipulation

arXiv 2605.18593 ↗First posted 18 May 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-vocabulary embodied AI agents increasingly rely on vision-language models such as CLIP for object perception and task grounding. However, the shared embedding space that enables this flexibility introduces a structural vulnerability to typographic attacks, where printed text in a physical scene semantically overrides visual judgment. While prior work has quantified this threat in static 2D benchmarks and 3D navigation tasks, its impact on the full Sense-Plan-Act pipeline of household robot manipulation remains unexplored. This work evaluates typographic attacks in a Habitat-based simulation using the HomeRobot benchmark. We introduce a decoupled perception architecture that exposes a frozen CLIP encoder to adversarial stickers while maintaining geometric grounding via DETIC. In a controlled evaluation pool of 59 attributable episodes, the attack achieves an overall Attack Success Rate (ASR) of 67.8%, rising to 70.0% among fully successful episodes, under uncontrolled viewing angles and occlusion with no perceptual optimization. Critically, we find that perceptual errors propagate through the persistent 3D semantic map to produce kinetic failures, defined here as physically executed grasping and transport of the wrong object driven by an adversarially poisoned semantic state. In these cases, the robot physically grasps and delivers the wrong object to a target receptacle. These results establish typographic misclassification as a real, measurable, and physically consequential threat to the safety of modular manipulation pipelines that prior typographic attack research has left unexamined.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 22 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Dyslexify: A Mechanistic Defense Against Typographic Attacks in CLIP28 Aug
  2. 2025SCAM: A Real-World Typographic Robustness Evaluation for Multimodal Foundation Models7 Apr
  3. 2024SceneTAP: Scene-Coherent Typographic Adversarial Planner against Vision-Language Models in Real-World Environments28 Nov
  4. 2023Defense-Prefix for Preventing Typographic Attacks on CLIP10 Apr

Other references · 18

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  3. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  4. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,163
  7. 2021CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulationcited by 617
  8. 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 613
  9. 2023TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Modelscited by 219
  10. 2021Simple but Effective: CLIP Embeddings for Embodied AIcited by 191
  11. 2020RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platformcited by 190
  12. 2023HomeRobot: Open-Vocabulary Mobile Manipulationcited by 104
6 more
  1. 2024Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Roboticscited by 68
  2. 2024LoRATK: LoRA Once, Backdoor Everywhere in the Share-and-Play Ecosystemcited by 22
  3. 2025FreezeVLA: Action-Freezing Attacks against Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 19
  4. 2024Robot Collapse: Supply Chain Backdoor Attacks Against VLM-based Robotic Manipulationcited by 13
  5. 2025CHAI: Command Hijacking against embodied AIcited by 9
  6. 2026Tex3D: Objects as Attack Surfaces via Adversarial 3D Textures for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reading Between the Pixels: Linking Text-Image Embedding Alignment to Typographic Attack Success on Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Altered Thoughts, Altered Actions: Probing Chain-of-Thought Vulnerabilities in VLA Robotic Manipulation
  3. 2026Towards Robustness against Typographic Attack with Training-free Concept Localization
  4. 2025Exploring Typographic Visual Prompts Injection Threats in Cross-Modality Generation Models
  5. 2024Manipulation Facing Threats: Evaluating Physical Vulnerabilities in End-to-End Vision Language Action Models
  6. 2026Physical Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Towards Transferable Attacks Against Vision-LLMs in Autonomous Driving with Typography
  8. 2026Hijacking Robots with a Piece of Paper: A Systematic Study of Physical Prompt Injection in VLM-Controlled Robots