mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CHAI: Command Hijacking against embodied AI

arXiv 2510.00181 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to handle edge cases in robotic vehicle systems where data is scarce by using common-sense reasoning grounded in perception and action to generalize beyond training distributions and adapt to novel real-world situations. These capabilities, however, also create new security risks. In this paper, we introduce CHAI (Command Hijacking against embodied AI), a physical environment indirect prompt injection attack that exploits the multimodal language interpretation abilities of AI models. CHAI embeds deceptive natural language instructions, such as misleading signs, in visual input, systematically searches the token space, builds a dictionary of prompts, and guides an attacker model to generate Visual Attack Prompts. We evaluate CHAI on four LVLM agents: drone emergency landing, autonomous driving, aerial object tracking, and on a real robotic vehicle. Our experiments show that CHAI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art attacks. By exploiting the semantic and multimodal reasoning strengths of next-generation embodied AI systems, CHAI underscores the urgent need for defenses that extend beyond traditional adversarial robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

Builds on

35 of 65 references.

References · 35

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  4. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  7. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,573
  8. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  9. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 527
  10. 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 517
  11. 2024DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 482
  12. 2023DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Large Language Modelcited by 455
23 more
  1. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Promptscited by 368
  2. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 307
  3. 2025OmniDrive: A Holistic Vision-Language Dataset for Autonomous Driving with Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 142
  4. 2023Dolphins: Multimodal Language Model for Drivingcited by 124
  5. 2025Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric Perspectivescited by 120
  6. 2024Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Modelscited by 112
  7. 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 79
  8. 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 66
  9. 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
  10. 2024SafeGen: Mitigating Sexually Explicit Content Generation in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 64
  11. 2024Visual-RolePlay: Universal Jailbreak Attack on MultiModal Large Language Models via Role-playing Image Charactercited by 61
  12. 2023Drive Anywhere: Generalizable End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Multi-modal Foundation Modelscited by 59
  13. 2025UAVs Meet LLMs: Overviews and Perspectives Toward Agentic Low-Altitude Mobilitycited by 48
  14. 2024Vision-LLMs Can Fool Themselves with Self-Generated Typographic Attackscited by 36
  15. 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Modelscited by 31
  16. 2023ToViLaG: Your Visual-Language Generative Model is Also An Evildoercited by 27
  17. 2024Stop Reasoning! When Multimodal LLM with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Meets Adversarial Imagecited by 26
  18. 2024Unveiling Typographic Deceptions: Insights of the Typographic Vulnerability in Large Vision-Language Modelcited by 22
  19. 2024SceneTAP: Scene-Coherent Typographic Adversarial Planner against Vision-Language Models in Real-World Environmentscited by 22
  20. 2024Adversarial Training Can Provably Improve Robustness: Theoretical Analysis of Feature Learning Process Under Structured Datacited by 12
  21. 2023Agent as Cerebrum, Controller as Cerebellum: Implementing an Embodied LMM-based Agent on Dronescited by 9
  22. 2024CloudTrack: Scalable UAV Tracking with Cloud Semanticscited by 3
  23. 2025Robust and Efficient AI-Based Attack Recovery in Autonomous Dronescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attacks
  2. 2026RoboJailBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Embodied Robotic Agents
  3. 2024Can We Trust Embodied Agents? Exploring Backdoor Attacks against Embodied LLM-based Decision-Making Systems
  4. 2026Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
  5. 2026Jailbreaking Embodied LLMs via Action-level Manipulation
  6. 2025ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots
  7. 2026Security of Foundation-Model-Powered Embodied Agents: Attack Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
  8. 2025Advancing Embodied Agent Security: From Safety Benchmarks to Input Moderation