mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dyslexify: A Mechanistic Defense Against Typographic Attacks in CLIP

arXiv 2508.20570 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Typographic attacks exploit multi-modal systems by injecting text into images, leading to targeted misclassifications, malicious content generation and even Vision-Language Model jailbreaks. In this work, we analyze how CLIP vision encoders behave under typographic attacks, locating specialized attention heads in the latter half of the model's layers that causally extract and transmit typographic information to the cls token. Building on these insights, we introduce Dyslexify - a method to defend CLIP models against typographic attacks by selectively ablating a typographic circuit, consisting of attention heads. Without requiring finetuning, dyslexify improves performance by up to 22.06% on a typographic variant of ImageNet-100, while reducing standard ImageNet-100 accuracy by less than 1%, and demonstrate its utility in a medical foundation model for skin lesion diagnosis. Notably, our training-free approach remains competitive with current state-of-the-art typographic defenses that rely on finetuning. To this end, we release a family of dyslexic CLIP models which are significantly more robust against typographic attacks. These models serve as suitable drop-in replacements for a broad range of safety-critical applications, where the risks of text-based manipulation outweigh the utility of text recognition.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SCAM: A Real-World Typographic Robustness Evaluation for Multimodal Foundation Models
  2. 2024Unveiling Typographic Deceptions: Insights of the Typographic Vulnerability in Large Vision-Language Model
  3. 2023Defense-Prefix for Preventing Typographic Attacks on CLIP
  4. 2026TYPO: Instruction-Dense Visual Jailbreaks against Commercial Closed-Source Image-Generation Models
  5. 2026Reading Between the Pixels: Linking Text-Image Embedding Alignment to Typographic Attack Success on Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025ToxicTextCLIP: Text-Based Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks on CLIP Pre-training
  7. 2025Robust Defense Strategies for Multimodal Contrastive Learning: Efficient Fine-tuning Against Backdoor Attacks
  8. 2026One Perturbation, Two Failure Modes: Probing VLM Safety via Embedding-Guided Typographic Perturbations