Reinforcement Learning with Semantic Rewards Enables Low-Resource Language Expansion without Alignment Tax
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Extending large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages often incurs an "alignment tax": improvements in the target language come at the cost of catastrophic forgetting in general capabilities. We argue that this trade-off arises from the rigidity of supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which enforces token-level surface imitation on narrow and biased data distributions. To address this limitation, we propose a semantic-space alignment paradigm powered by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), where the model is optimized using embedding-level semantic rewards rather than likelihood maximization. This objective encourages meaning preservation through flexible realizations, enabling controlled updates that reduce destructive interference with pretrained knowledge. We evaluate our approach on Tibetan-Chinese machine translation and Tibetan headline generation. Experiments show that our method acquires low-resource capabilities while markedly mitigating alignment tax, preserving general competence more effectively than SFT. Despite producing less rigid surface overlap, semantic RL yields higher semantic quality and preference in open-ended generation, and few-shot transfer results indicate that it learns more transferable and robust representations under limited supervision. Overall, our study demonstrates that reinforcement learning with semantic rewards provides a safer and more reliable pathway for inclusive low-resource language expansion.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018A Span-Extraction Dataset for Chinese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 84
- 2024ALLaM: Large Language Models for Arabic and Englishcited by 55
- 2024Low-Rank Adaptation for Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 35
- 2025Conditions for Catastrophic Forgetting in Multilingual Translationcited by 10
- 2025Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Target Language Adaptation of LLMs via Source-Shielded Updatescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reference-Free Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning for MT: A Seq2Seq Perspective
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
- 2024Supervised Fine-Tuning as Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Mending the Holes: Mitigating Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Translation
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization
- 2025Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach
- 2025Improving Low-Resource Translation with Dictionary-Guided Fine-Tuning and RL: A Spanish-to-Wayuunaiki Study
- 2025SR-GRPO: Stable Rank as an Intrinsic Geometric Reward for Large Language Model Alignment