SR-GRPO: Stable Rank as an Intrinsic Geometric Reward for Large Language Model Alignment
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences typically relies on external supervision, which faces critical limitations: human annotations are scarce and subjective, reward models are vulnerable to reward hacking, and self-evaluation methods suffer from prompt sensitivity and biases. In this work, we propose stable rank, an intrinsic, annotation-free quality signal derived from model representations. Stable rank measures the effective dimensionality of hidden states by computing the ratio of total variance to dominant-direction variance, capturing quality through how information distributes across representation dimensions. Empirically, stable rank achieves 84.04% accuracy on RewardBench and improves task accuracy by an average of 11.3 percentage points over greedy decoding via Best-of-N sampling. Leveraging this insight, we introduce Stable Rank Group Relative Policy Optimization (SR-GRPO), which uses stable rank as a reward signal for reinforcement learning. Without external supervision, SR-GRPO improves Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct by 10% on STEM and 19% on mathematical reasoning, outperforming both learned reward models and self-evaluation baselines. Our findings demonstrate that quality signals can be extracted from internal model geometry, offering a path toward scalable alignment without external supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.
Builds on
8 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy2 Jul
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training22 Nov
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
Other references · 4
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A First-Order Logic-Based Alternative to Reward Models in RLHF
- 2025Energy-Based Reward Models for Robust Language Model Alignment
- 2026A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment
- 2026BiasGRPO: Stabilizing Bias Mitigation in High-Variance Reward Landscapes via Group-Relative Policy Optimization
- 2025Reusing Embeddings: Reproducible Reward Model Research in Large Language Model Alignment without GPUs
- 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment
- 2024Rethinking the Role of Proxy Rewards in Language Model Alignment
- 2025Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only