Reinforcing Multimodal Reasoning Against Visual Degradation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet the resulting policies remain brittle against real-world visual degradations such as blur, compression artifacts, and low-resolution scans. Prior robustness techniques from vision and deep RL rely on static data augmentation or value-based regularization, neither of which transfers cleanly to critic-free RL fine-tuning of autoregressive MLLMs. Reinforcing reasoning against such corruptions is non-trivial: naively injecting degraded views during rollout induces reward poisoning, where perceptual occlusions trigger hallucinated trajectories and destabilize optimization. We propose ROMA, an RL fine-tuning framework that modifies the optimization dynamics to reinforce reasoning against visual degradation while preserving clean-input performance. A dual-forward-pass strategy uses teacher forcing to evaluate corrupted views against clean-image trajectories, avoiding new rollouts on degraded inputs. For distributional consistency, we apply a token-level surrogate KL penalty against the worst-case augmentation; to prevent policy collapse under regularization, an auxiliary policy gradient loss anchored to clean-image advantages preserves a reliable reward signal; and to avoid systematically incorrect invariance, correctness-conditioned regularization restricts enforcement to successful trajectories. On Qwen3-VL 4B/8B across seven multimodal reasoning benchmarks, our method improves robustness by +2.4% on seen and +2.3% on unseen corruptions over GRPO while matching clean accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 18
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Stable and Efficient Single-Rollout RL for Multimodal Reasoning20 Dec
- 2025Dual-Uncertainty Guided Policy Learning for Multimodal Reasoning1 Oct
- 2025Self-Rewarding Vision-Language Model via Reasoning Decomposition27 Aug
- 2025Shuffle-R1: Efficient RL framework for Multimodal Large Language Models via Data-centric Dynamic Shuffle7 Aug
- 2025Perception-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning8 Jul
- 2025R1-ShareVL: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Share-GRPO22 May
- 2025NoisyRollout: Reinforcing Visual Reasoning with Data Augmentation17 Apr
- 2025VisualPuzzles: Decoupling Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation from Domain Knowledge14 Apr
- 2025VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning10 Apr
- 2025Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Models26 Mar
- 2025OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles21 Mar
- 2025R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization13 Mar
6 more
- 2025LMM-R1: Empowering 3B LMMs with Strong Reasoning Abilities Through Two-Stage Rule-Based RL10 Mar
- 2025Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models9 Mar
- 2024LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts6 Jul
- 2024We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?1 Jul
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts3 Oct
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning19 Mar
Other references · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
- 2020Automatic Data Augmentation for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 71
- 2025Parallel-R1: Towards Parallel Thinking via Reinforcement Learningcited by 59
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Align Then Reason: A Multimodal Lip-Sync Judge for Dubbing30 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026On Robustness and Chain-of-Thought Consistency of RL-Finetuned VLMs
- 2026Visually-Guided Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Robust-R1: Degradation-Aware Reasoning for Robust Visual Understanding
- 2025Learning Only with Images: Visual Reinforcement Learning with Reasoning, Rendering, and Visual Feedback
- 2026IVR-R1: Refining Trajectories through Iterative Visual-Grounded Reasoning in Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Perception-Consistency Multimodal Large Language Models Reasoning via Caption-Regularized Policy Optimization
- 2025Mitigating Visual Context Degradation in Large Multimodal Models: A Training-Free Decoupled Agentic Framework
- 2025Observe-R1: Unlocking Reasoning Abilities of MLLMs with Dynamic Progressive Reinforcement Learning