Robust-R1: Degradation-Aware Reasoning for Robust Visual Understanding
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal Large Language Models struggle to maintain reliable performance under extreme real-world visual degradations, which impede their practical robustness. Existing robust MLLMs predominantly rely on implicit training/adaptation that focuses solely on visual encoder generalization, suffering from limited interpretability and isolated optimization. To overcome these limitations, we propose Robust-R1, a novel framework that explicitly models visual degradations through structured reasoning chains. Our approach integrates: (i) supervised fine-tuning for degradation-aware reasoning foundations, (ii) reward-driven alignment for accurately perceiving degradation parameters, and (iii) dynamic reasoning depth scaling adapted to degradation intensity. To facilitate this approach, we introduce a specialized 11K dataset featuring realistic degradations synthesized across four critical real-world visual processing stages, each annotated with structured chains connecting degradation parameters, perceptual influence, pristine semantic reasoning chain, and conclusion. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate state-of-the-art robustness: Robust-R1 outperforms all general and robust baselines on the real-world degradation benchmark R-Bench, while maintaining superior anti-degradation performance under multi-intensity adversarial degradations on MMMB, MMStar, and RealWorldQA.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.
Builds on
0 of 35 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2025LongVideoAgent: Multi-Agent Reasoning with Long Videoscited by 25
- 2026TIR-Agent: Training an Explorative and Efficient Agent for Image Restorationcited by 5
- 2026SpaceDG: Benchmarking Spatial Intelligence under Visual Degradationcited by 1
- 2026Robust-U1: Can MLLMs Self-Recover Corrupted Visual Content for Robust Understanding?cited by 1
- 2026Unleashing Multimodal Large Language Models for Training-free HOI Detection in the Wildcited by 1
- 2026VisualDeltas: Learning Preferences from Visual Quality Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026Remember-R1: Mitigating Long-Context Visual Forgetting through Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Remember-R1: Mitigating Long-Context Visual Forgetting through Reinforcement Learning2 Aug 2026
- 2026Unleashing Multimodal Large Language Models for Training-free HOI Detection in the Wild15 Jul 2026
- 2026Robust-U1: Can MLLMs Self-Recover Corrupted Visual Content for Robust Understanding?6 Jun 2026
- 2026SpaceDG: Benchmarking Spatial Intelligence under Visual Degradation21 May 2026
- 2026TIR-Agent: Training an Explorative and Efficient Agent for Image Restoration29 Mar 2026
- 2026VisualDeltas: Learning Preferences from Visual Quality Perturbations7 Mar 2026
- 2025LongVideoAgent: Multi-Agent Reasoning with Long Videos23 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reinforcing Multimodal Reasoning Against Visual Degradation
- 2026Understanding Degradation with Vision Language Model
- 2026Predictive Regularization Against Visual Representation Degradation in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026BRUCE: Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation for Scientific Vision-Language Reasoning
- 2026CLEAR: Unlocking Generative Potential for Degraded Image Understanding in Unified Multimodal Models
- 2026Scaling Test-Time Robustness of Vision-Language Models via Self-Critical Inference Framework
- 2025MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs
- 2026Diagnosing Visual Ignorance in Vision-Language Models