mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

StoryAlign: Evaluating and Training Reward Models for Story Generation

arXiv 2605.04831 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Story generation aims to automatically produce coherent, structured, and engaging narratives. Although large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced text generation, stories generated by LLMs still diverge from human-authored works regarding complex narrative structure and human-aligned preferences. A key reason is the absence of effective modeling of human story preferences, which are inherently subjective and under-explored. In this work, we systematically evaluate the modeling of human story preferences and introduce StoryRMB, the first benchmark for assessing reward models on story preferences. StoryRMB contains 1,133 high-quality, human-verified instances, each consisting of a prompt, one chosen story, and three rejected stories. We find existing reward models struggle to select human-preferred stories, with the best model achieving only 66.3% accuracy. To address this limitation, we construct roughly 100,000 high-quality story preference pairs across diverse domains and develop StoryReward, an advanced reward model for story preference trained on this dataset. StoryReward achieves state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on StoryRMB, outperforming much larger models. We also adopt StoryReward in downstream test-time scaling applications for best-of-n (BoN) story selection and find that it generally chooses stories better aligned with human preferences. We will release our dataset, model, and code to facilitate future research. Related code and data are available at https://github.com/THU-KEG/StoryReward.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

33 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing1 Jul
  2. 2025AI-Slop to AI-Polish? Aligning Language Models through Edit-Based Writing Rewards and Test-time Computation10 Apr
  3. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback2 Oct

Other references · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  5. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  6. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  7. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
  8. 2024Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learningcited by 241
  9. 2023Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativitycited by 172
  10. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMscited by 142
  11. 2019Strategies for Structuring Story Generationcited by 124
  12. 2023Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Modelscited by 91
18 more
  1. 2023EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 80
  2. 2024Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives?cited by 79
  3. 2024Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHFcited by 60
  4. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Reward Models: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Futurecited by 53
  5. 2025Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systemscited by 51
  6. 2025QwenLong-L1: Towards Long-Context Large Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  7. 2025Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewardscited by 50
  8. 2024Do Language Models Enjoy Their Own Stories? Prompting Large Language Models for Automatic Story Evaluationcited by 32
  9. 2024Generating Long-form Story Using Dynamic Hierarchical Outlining with Memory-Enhancementcited by 30
  10. 2022Open-world Story Generation with Structured Knowledge Enhancement: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 22
  11. 2025StoryWriter: A Multi-Agent Framework for Long Story Generationcited by 19
  12. 2024What Makes a Good Story and How Can We Measure It? A Comprehensive Survey of Story Evaluationcited by 17
  13. 2024Navigating the Path of Writing: Outline-guided Text Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 15
  14. 2025A Cognitive Writing Perspective for Constrained Long-Form Text Generationcited by 14
  15. 2024MoPS: Modular Story Premise Synthesis for Open-Ended Automatic Story Generationcited by 13
  16. 2024Constraint Back-translation Improves Complex Instruction Following of Large Language Modelscited by 11
  17. 2024Guiding and Diversifying LLM-Based Story Generation via Answer Set Programmingcited by 9
  18. 2025Can LLMs Generate Good Stories? Insights and Challenges from a Narrative Planning Perspectivecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Robust Preference Learning for Storytelling via Contrastive Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generation
  3. 2026StoryLens: Preference-Aligned Story Rewriting via Context-Aware Narrative Enrichment
  4. 2026Rewarding Creativity: A Human-Aligned Generative Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning in Storytelling
  5. 2025Style over Story: Measuring LLM Narrative Preferences via Structured Selection
  6. 2025Language Models Might Not Understand You: Evaluating Theory of Mind via Story Prompting
  7. 2025EvolvR: Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning for Story Evaluation to Enhance Generation
  8. 2023GROVE: A Retrieval-augmented Complex Story Generation Framework with A Forest of Evidence