mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems

arXiv 2605.00741 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) systems at the network edge of smart architectures is increasing rapidly, intensifying the need for security mechanisms that are both adaptive and resource-efficient. In such environments, runtime defence mechanisms are no longer limited to detection alone but become a resource-constrained task of selecting mitigation actions. Security controls must be carefully selected, combined, and executed under latency, energy, and computational constraints, while preventing unsafe interactions between controls. Existing approaches predominantly rely on static rule sets and learned policies, which provide limited guarantees of feasibility, conflict safety, and execution correctness in resource-constrained edge settings. To address this limitation, we introduce ASPO, a self-adaptive multi-agent security pattern selection that integrates Large Language Model (LLM)-based reasoning with deterministic enforcement within a MAPE-K control loop. ASPO explicitly separates stochastic decision generation from execution: LLM agents propose candidate mitigation portfolios, while a deterministic optimisation core enforces closed-world action integrity, conflict-free composition, and resource feasibility at every decision epoch. We deploy ASPO on a distributed edge-gateway testbed and evaluate it across two workloads, each comprising 500 and 1000 runtime security decisions, using replayed IoT attack traffic. In addition, the results demonstrate invariant safety properties, including 100% conflict-free activation, consistent resource feasibility across workloads, and stable pattern dominance with perfect rank preservation. Importantly, deeper decision exploration reduces extreme-case execution costs, compressing tail latency and energy overheads by 21.9% and 23.1%, respectively, without increasing mean energy consumption.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024From Allies to Adversaries: Manipulating LLM Tool-Calling through Adversarial Injection13 Dec
  2. 2024PentestAgent: Incorporating LLM Agents to Automated Penetration Testing7 Nov

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  3. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  6. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  7. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 431
  8. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 365
  9. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 96
  10. 2025Defending Against Prompt Injection With a Few DefensiveTokenscited by 33
  11. 2025Forewarned is Forearmed: A Survey on Large Language Model-based Agents in Autonomous Cyberattackscited by 16
  12. 2024Entity-based Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defencecited by 11
5 more
  1. 2025Multi-Objective Adaptive Rate Limiting in Microservices Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  2. 2025Guidelines for Applying RL and MARL in Cybersecurity Applicationscited by 2
  3. 2025Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distance for Measuring Distribution Shift in Machine Learningcited by 2
  4. 2025Demo: A Practical Testbed for Decentralized Federated Learning on Physical Edge Devicescited by 1
  5. 2025Adaptive Security Policy Management in Cloud Environments Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Swarm-Driven Multi-Agent Reasoning for Smart City Security
  2. 2026VEXAIoT: Autonomous IoT Vulnerability EXploitation using AI Agents
  3. 2026Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Network for Industrial IoT Predictive Maintenance
  4. 2025L2M-AID: Autonomous Cyber-Physical Defense by Fusing Semantic Reasoning of Large Language Models with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Preprint)
  5. 2026Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Low-Altitude Economy IoT: An LLM-Enhanced Agentic AI Framework
  7. 2026Policy-Aware Edge LLM-RAG Framework for Internet of Battlefield Things Mission Orchestration
  8. 2026SGTO-MAS: Secure Gorilla Troops Optimization for Multi-Agent LLM Systems