Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Network for Industrial IoT Predictive Maintenance
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial IoT predictive maintenance requires systems capable of real-time anomaly detection without sacrificing interpretability or demanding excessive computational resources. Traditional approaches rely on static, offline-trained models that cannot adapt to evolving operational conditions, while LLM-based monolithic systems demand prohibitive memory and latency, rendering them impractical for on-site edge deployment. We introduce SEMAS, a self-evolving hierarchical multi-agent system that distributes specialized agents across Edge, Fog, and Cloud computational tiers. Edge agents perform lightweight feature extraction and pre-filtering; Fog agents execute diversified ensemble detection with dynamic consensus voting; and Cloud agents continuously optimize system policies via Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) while maintaining asynchronous, non-blocking inference. The framework incorporates LLM-based response generation for explainability and federated knowledge aggregation for adaptive policy distribution. This architecture enables resource-aware specialization without sacrificing real-time performance or model interpretability. Empirical evaluation on two industrial benchmarks (Boiler Emulator and Wind Turbine) demonstrates that SEMAS achieves superior anomaly detection performance with exceptional stability under adaptation, sustains prediction accuracy across evolving operational contexts, and delivers substantial latency improvements enabling genuine real-time deployment. Ablation studies confirm that PPO-driven policy evolution, consensus voting, and federated aggregation each contribute materially to system effectiveness. These findings indicate that resource-aware, self-evolving 1multi-agent coordination is essential for production-ready industrial IoT predictive maintenance under strict latency and explainability constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
6 of 28 references.
References · 6
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectivescited by 27
- 2018Resource Management in Fog/Edge Computing: A Surveycited by 13
- 2025A Taxonomy of Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems: Design Patterns, Coordination Mechanisms, and Industrial Applicationscited by 8
- 2025A Large Language Model-Enabled Control Architecture for Dynamic Resource Capability Exploration in Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systemscited by 4
- 2020Predictive Maintenance for Edge-Based Sensor Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems
- 2026Multi-Agent Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Low-Altitude Economy IoT: An LLM-Enhanced Agentic AI Framework
- 2026AOI: Turning Failed Trajectories into Training Signals for Autonomous Cloud Diagnosis
- 2025LLM-Empowered Agentic AI for QoE-Aware Network Slicing Management in Industrial IoT ↗
- 2026Autonomous Topology Mutation: Safe Runtime Restructuring for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Capability, State, and Shadow Invariants
- 2026Plan First, Judge Later, Run Better: A DMAIC-Inspired Agentic System for Industrial Anomaly Detection
- 2026RIVA: Leveraging LLM Agents for Reliable Configuration Drift Detection
- 2026Semantic Multi-Agent Intrusion Detection for IoT:Zero-Day and Adversarial Threats with Risk-Aware Reasoning