Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is increasingly adopted to secure Internet-of-Things (IoT) networks due to its centralized control and programmable forwarding. However, SDN-IoT defense is inherently a closed-loop control problem in which mitigation actions impact controller workload, queue dynamics, rule-installation delay, and future traffic observations. Aggressive mitigation may destabilize the control plane, degrade Quality of Service (QoS), and amplify systemic risk. Existing learning-based approaches prioritize detection accuracy while neglecting controller coupling and short-horizon Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimization without structured, auditable policy evolution. This paper introduces a self-reflective two-timescale SDN-IoT defense solution separating fast mitigation from slow policy governance. At the fast timescale, per-switch Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agents perform controller-aware mitigation under safety constraints and action masking. At the slow timescale, a multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) governance engine generates machine-parsable updates to the global policy constitution Pi, which encodes admissible actions, safety thresholds, and reward priorities. Updates (Delta Pi) are validated through stress testing and deployed only with non-regression and safety guarantees, ensuring an auditable evolution without retraining RL agents. Evaluation under heterogeneous IoT traffic and adversarial stress shows improvements of 9.1% Macro-F1 over PPO and 15.4% over static baselines. Worst-case degradation drops by 36.8%, controller backlog peaks by 42.7%, and RTT p95 inflation remains below 5.8% under high-intensity attacks. Policy evolution converges within five cycles, reducing catastrophic overload from 11.6% to 2.3%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 53 references.
References · 6
- 2023Optimal Attack and Defense for Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2025Energy, Scalability, Data and Security in Massive IoT: Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 3
- 2024Security Modelling for Cyber-Physical Systems: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 2
- 2024A Directional Rockafellar-Uryasev Regressioncited by 1
- 2025Quantitative Resilience Modeling for Autonomous Cyber Defensecited by 1
- 2025SmartSecChain-SDN: A Blockchain-Integrated Intelligent Framework for Secure and Efficient Software-Defined Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems
- 2025LLM-Empowered Agentic MAC Protocols: A Dynamic Stackelberg Game Approach
- 2025L2M-AID: Autonomous Cyber-Physical Defense by Fusing Semantic Reasoning of Large Language Models with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Preprint)
- 2026Neuro-Agentic Control: A Deep Learning-based LLM-Powered Agentic AI Framework for Controlling Security Controls
- 2025RESTRAIN: Reinforcement Learning-Based Secure Framework for Trigger-Action IoT Environment
- 2024Enhancing IoT Intelligence: A Transformer-based Reinforcement Learning Methodology
- 2024Fully Distributed Fog Load Balancing with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Analysis of flexible traffic control method in SDN