mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

L2M-AID: Autonomous Cyber-Physical Defense by Fusing Semantic Reasoning of Large Language Models with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Preprint)

arXiv 2510.07363 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing integration of Industrial IoT (IIoT) exposes critical cyber-physical systems to sophisticated, multi-stage attacks that elude traditional defenses lacking contextual awareness. This paper introduces L2M-AID, a novel framework for Autonomous Industrial Defense using LLM-empowered, Multi-agent reinforcement learning. L2M-AID orchestrates a team of collaborative agents, each driven by a Large Language Model (LLM), to achieve adaptive and resilient security. The core innovation lies in the deep fusion of two AI paradigms: we leverage an LLM as a semantic bridge to translate vast, unstructured telemetry into a rich, contextual state representation, enabling agents to reason about adversary intent rather than merely matching patterns. This semantically-aware state empowers a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) algorithm, MAPPO, to learn complex cooperative strategies. The MARL reward function is uniquely engineered to balance security objectives (threat neutralization) with operational imperatives, explicitly penalizing actions that disrupt physical process stability. To validate our approach, we conduct extensive experiments on the benchmark SWaT dataset and a novel synthetic dataset generated based on the MITRE ATT&CK for ICS framework. Results demonstrate that L2M-AID significantly outperforms traditional IDS, deep learning anomaly detectors, and single-agent RL baselines across key metrics, achieving a 97.2% detection rate while reducing false positives by over 80% and improving response times by a factor of four. Crucially, it demonstrates superior performance in maintaining physical process stability, presenting a robust new paradigm for securing critical national infrastructure.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

11 of 32 references.

References · 11

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  4. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  5. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
  6. 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  7. 2025A Survey of AI Agent Protocolscited by 81
  8. 2023LogPr'ecis: Unleashing Language Models for Automated Malicious Log Analysiscited by 8
  9. 2024A Survey of Large Language Models in Cybersecuritycited by 8
  10. 2019Omni SCADA Intrusion Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithmscited by 4
  11. 2024Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems
  2. 2026Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operations
  3. 2026Ask the Expert: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defense
  4. 2025Large Language Models are Autonomous Cyber Defenders
  5. 2025Game Theory Meets LLM and Agentic AI: Reimagining Cybersecurity for the Age of Intelligent Threats
  6. 2024Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Maritime Operational Technology Cyber Security
  7. 2026Towards Hierarchical Cyber Defense with Large Language Models: From Planning to Execution
  8. 2026Learning Communication Between Heterogeneous Agents in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence