SGTO-MAS: Secure Gorilla Troops Optimization for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems offer strong capabilities for complex reasoning and decision-making, yet coordination across agents introduces error propagation, security risks, and inefficient use of resources. Existing methods often rely on heuristic, static strategies and lack a principled mechanism for balancing performance, security, and computational cost. This paper formulates multi-agent LLM coordination as a constrained optimization problem and proposes a security-aware method for adaptive agent selection. The method integrates trust modeling, risk-aware evaluation, and collective intelligence within a unified optimization objective. To solve the problem efficiently, we use a swarm-intelligence strategy inspired by Gorilla Troops Optimization (GTO), enabling adaptive coordination under varying threat conditions. Controlled experiments across 500 independent runs demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The system achieves a stable average performance score of 0.5281, with high consensus (0.8764), controlled risk (0.3000), and compact agent subsets averaging 4.04 selected agents. The optimization process converges efficiently, with an average runtime of 24.09 seconds per run and low score variability (standard deviation = 0.0173). Robustness analysis indicates graceful degradation under perturbations, with performance drops limited to 2.5% under agent removal and 5.3% under consensus disruption. These results show that effective multi-agent coordination can be achieved through structured optimization that jointly manages performance, security, and efficiency. The proposed method provides a practical security-aware solution for coordinating multi-agent LLM systems in complex adversarial settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems1 Apr
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar
Other references · 5
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 312
- 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflowscited by 58
- 2025MALF: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Intelligent Fuzzing of Industrial Control Protocolscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLMs Working in Harmony: A Survey on the Technological Aspects of Building Effective LLM-Based Multi Agent Systems
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems
- 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents
- 2025Beyond Self-Talk: A Communication-Centric Survey of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
- 2026Defending LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Against Cooperative Attacks with Sentence-Level Rectification
- 2026Insider Attacks in Multi-Agent LLM Consensus Systems
- 2025Comprehensive Vulnerability Analysis is Necessary for Trustworthy LLM-MAS