mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VEXAIoT: Autonomous IoT Vulnerability EXploitation using AI Agents

arXiv 2607.09653 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Internet of Things (IoT) systems are inherently vulnerable due to constrained hardware, outdated firmware, and insecure default configurations, creating a need for scalable and adaptive security testing approaches. While recent adoptions of Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated promise in penetration testing and Capture-the-Flag (CTF) environments, their application to IoT specific vulnerabilities remains unexplored. This paper presents an autonomous multi-agent framework, referred to as Vulnerability EXploitation using AI Agents (VEXAIoT), for vulnerability discovery and exploitation in IoT environments using LLM-based reasoning and offensive security tools. The framework combines a vulnerability detection agent and an attack execution agent to perform reconnaissance, plan attack sequences, and execute exploits against vulnerable IoT services. The system is evaluated in IoTGoat and Metasploitable environments across ten attack scenarios mapped to OWASP IoT vulnerabilities. Experimental results show attack success rate of up to 100% with low token overhead and average execution times under two minutes for most attacks. Across 260 attack executions, VEXAIoT achieves a 95.0% overall success rate, including 94.5% success in IoTGoat and 96.7% success in Metasploitable2. These results demonstrate the potential for LLM-driven agents to automate IoT vulnerability assessment and offensive security workflows in controlled environments

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes8 Jan
  2. 2025AutoPentester: An LLM Agent-based Framework for Automated Pentesting7 Oct
  3. 2024Hacking CTFs with Plain Agents3 Dec
  4. 2024EnIGMA: Interactive Tools Substantially Assist LM Agents in Finding Security Vulnerabilities24 Sep

Other references · 3

  1. 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 137
  2. 2018Towards the Development of Realistic Botnet Dataset in the Internet of Things for Network Forensic Analytics: Bot-IoT Datasetcited by 98
  3. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems
  2. 2026Multi-Agent Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Low-Altitude Economy IoT: An LLM-Enhanced Agentic AI Framework
  3. 2025Toward a Safe Internet of Agents
  4. 2026Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives
  5. 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows
  6. 2026Argus: Reorchestrating Static Analysis via a Multi-Agent Ensemble for Full-Chain Security Vulnerability Detection
  7. 2025Security of Internet of Agents: Attacks and Countermeasures
  8. 2025Agentic AI for 6G: A New Paradigm for Autonomous RAN Security Compliance