Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization: Breaking RLVR's Indifference to Diversity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has achieved substantial gains in single-attempt accuracy (Pass@1) on reasoning tasks, yet often suffers from reduced multi-sample coverage (Pass@K), indicating diversity collapse. We identify a structural cause for this degradation: common RLVR objectives, such as GRPO, are indifferent to how probability mass is distributed among correct solutions. Combined with stochastic training dynamics, this indifference induces a self-reinforcing collapse, in which probability mass concentrates on a narrow subset of correct outputs while alternative valid solutions are suppressed. We formalize this collapse mechanism and further characterize the optimal policy structure under two complementary criteria: robustness and entropy-regularized optimality, which identify the Uniform-Correct Policy as uniquely optimal. Motivated by this analysis, we propose Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization (UCPO), a modification to GRPO that adds a conditional uniformity penalty on the policy's distribution over correct solutions. The penalty redistributes gradient signal toward underrepresented correct responses, encouraging uniform allocation of probability mass within the correct set. Across three models (1.5B-7B parameters) and five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, UCPO improves Pass@K and diversity while maintaining competitive Pass@1, achieving up to +10% absolute improvement on AIME24 at Pass@64 and up to 45% higher equation-level diversity within the correct set. The code is available at https://github.com/AnamikaLochab/UCPO.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 29 references.
References · 25
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 540
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 463
- 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
- 2025Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimizationcited by 166
- 2025Pass@k Training for Adaptively Balancing Exploration and Exploitation of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 134
13 more
- 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 92
- 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 84
- 2025Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoningcited by 79
- 2025Rewarding the Unlikely: Lifting GRPO Beyond Distribution Sharpeningcited by 78
- 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVRcited by 38
- 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMscited by 32
- 2025Diversity-Incentivized Exploration for Versatile Reasoningcited by 28
- 2025Rethinking Entropy Regularization in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 25
- 2025Enhancing Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMscited by 23
- 2025Differential Smoothing Mitigates Sharpening and Improves LLM Reasoningcited by 19
- 2026F-GRPO: Don't Let Your Policy Learn the Obvious and Forget the Rarecited by 10
- 2025Can GRPO Help LLMs Transcend Their Pretraining Origin?cited by 5
- 2026LAD: Learning Advantage Distribution for Reasoningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026OISD: On-Policy Internal Self-Distillation of Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Plans You Can Check: Verifier-Grounded Learning of an Open-Weight Planner for Executable Video-Editingcited by 1
- 2026Toward Plasticity-Preserving KL Regularization for Capability Retention in LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Strategically Diverse Sampling for Self-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026SERA: Scale-Equalized Rollout Allocation for Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVRcited by 0
- 2026Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVR8 Oct 2026
- 2026SERA: Scale-Equalized Rollout Allocation for Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learning29 Sep 2026
- 2026Strategically Diverse Sampling for Self-Training25 Sep 2026
- 2026Plans You Can Check: Verifier-Grounded Learning of an Open-Weight Planner for Executable Video-Editing26 Aug 2026
- 2026Toward Plasticity-Preserving KL Regularization for Capability Retention in LLM Reinforcement Learning3 Aug 2026
- 2026OISD: On-Policy Internal Self-Distillation of Language Models27 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Understanding Diversity Collapse in RLVR via the Lens of Overtraining
- 2026Binary Rewards and Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Challenges
- 2026Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective
- 2025On the optimization dynamics of RLVR: Gradient gap and step size thresholds
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable yet Noisy Rewards under Imperfect Verifiers
- 2026How to Allocate, How to Learn? Dynamic Rollout Allocation and Advantage Modulation for Policy Optimization
- 2026A Gradient Perspective on RLVR Stability and Winner Advantage Policy Optimization
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward