Toward Plasticity-Preserving KL Regularization for Capability Retention in LLM Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central paradigm for large language model (LLM) post-training, but optimization toward new objectives can degrade capabilities already present in the base model. KL regularization is widely used to mitigate such forgetting by constraining policy drift toward a reference model. However, standard full-policy KL regularization constrains the entire response distribution and may unnecessarily restrict exploration and target-task learning. This raises a natural question: can a more precise constraint preserve existing capabilities while minimizing interference with learning new tasks? To this end, we propose underlineCorrectness-Conditioned underlineKL Regularization (CoKL), a conditional regularization framework that narrows the preservation constraint from the full output distribution to correctness-conditioned response distributions. We instantiate CoKL with forward KL divergence and derive a practical finite-group training objective for RL-based LLM post-training. At the population level, CoKL decouples the total probability assigned to correct responses from their correctness-conditioned distribution, thereby regularizing the relative probability allocation among reference-supported correct responses without directly anchoring incorrect outputs or total correctness mass. We further show that full-policy forward and reverse KL regularization induce a strict optimal correctness gap when the reference policy is imperfect, whereas CoKL avoids this limitation. Experiments in controlled multi-solution environments and continual post-training settings across multiple model scales demonstrate that CoKL achieves a more favorable balance between target-task improvement and prior-capability retention than existing regularization methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lumina04/CoKL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
28 of 38 references.
References · 28
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
16 more
- 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 181
- 2025SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoningcited by 145
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 138
- 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVRcited by 38
- 2025The Choice of Divergence: A Neglected Key to Mitigating Diversity Collapse in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardcited by 36
- 2025Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuningcited by 33
- 2025KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning is Designed to Mode Collapsecited by 29
- 2025Language Models that Think, Chat Bettercited by 23
- 2026Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 10
- 2026Advancing General-Purpose Reasoning Models with Modular Gradient Surgerycited by 9
- 2026DSDR: Dual-Scale Diversity Regularization for Exploration in LLM Reasoningcited by 9
- 2025Unlocking Reasoning Capabilities in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning Explorationcited by 7
- 2026Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization: Breaking RLVR's Indifference to Diversitycited by 6
- 2026ResRL: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Negative Sample Projection Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2026SAGE: Shaping Anchors for Guided Exploration in RLVR of LLMscited by 3
- 2026expo: Exploration-prioritized policy optimization via adaptive kl regulation and gaussian curriculum samplingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.