Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A language model (LM) can usually answer the same question in more than one way, but reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is indifferent to which correct answer a model produces. A solution will earn the same reward whether it is the thousandth copy of a familiar answer or one the model has never produced before. Yet, there is potential value in having the model retain multiple correct solutions as it is trained. For instance, multiple modes may give users a choice and provide problem-solving strategies that improve overall model performance. Here, we introduce ModeBench, a benchmark of multi-solution tasks in which the verifier returns both correctness and mode discovered. We then use ModeBench to measure how solution diversity changes under RLVR post-training. We find that RLVR post-training concentrates probability onto fewer correct modes even as accuracy holds or improves, and moreover, that frontier models are already highly concentrated. We then introduce our solution, Re:Max, which stores one verified example per discovered mode in a replay buffer and trains on those stored modes uniformly. A solution found once is, therefore, practiced as often as one found repeatedly. Across three model scales, two RL objectives, and harder task constructions, replay improves both how often a policy succeeds and how many different ways it can succeed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
26 of 50 references.
References · 26
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 463
14 more
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 406
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 302
- 2025Pass@k Training for Adaptively Balancing Exploration and Exploitation of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 134
- 2025Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoningcited by 79
- 2025The Choice of Divergence: A Neglected Key to Mitigating Diversity Collapse in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardcited by 36
- 2025RLEP: Reinforcement Learning with Experience Replay for LLM Reasoningcited by 35
- 2026Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2026How LLMs Distort Our Written Languagecited by 20
- 2026SetPO: Set-Level Policy Optimization for Diversity-Preserving LLM Reasoningcited by 9
- 2026Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization: Breaking RLVR's Indifference to Diversitycited by 6
- 2026Beyond Mode Collapse: Distribution Matching for Diverse Reasoningcited by 5
- 2026Expected Return Causes Outcome-Level Mode Collapse in Reinforcement Learning and How to Fix It with Inverse Probability Scalingcited by 4
- 2026Argument Collapse: LLMs Flatten Long-Form Public Debatecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.