Interpretable and Explainable Surrogate Modeling for Simulations: A State-of-the-Art Survey and Perspectives on Explainable AI for Decision-Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The simulation of complex systems increasingly relies on sophisticated but fundamentally opaque computational black-box simulators. Surrogate models play a central role in reducing the computational cost of complex systems simulations across a wide range of scientific and engineering domains. Notwithstanding, they inevitably inherit and often exacerbate this black-box nature, obscuring how input variables drive physical responses. Conversely, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) offers powerful tools to unpack these models. Yet, XAI methods struggle with engineering-specific constraints, such as highly correlated inputs, dynamical systems, and rigorous reliability requirements. Consequently, surrogate modeling and XAI have largely evolved as distinct fields of research, despite their strong complementarity. To reconnect these approaches, this state-of-the-art survey provides a structured perspective that maps existing XAI techniques onto the various stages of surrogate modeling workflows for design and exploration. To ground this synthesis, we draw upon illustrative applications across both equation-based simulations and agent-based modeling. We survey a broad spectrum of techniques, highlighting their strengths for revealing interactions and supporting human comprehension. Finally, we identify pressing open challenges, including the explainability of dynamical systems and the handling of mixed-variable systems, and propose a research agenda to make explainability a core, embedded element of simulation-driven workflows from model construction through decision-making. By transforming opaque emulators into explainable tools, this agenda empowers practitioners to move beyond accelerating simulations to extracting actionable insights from complex system behaviors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 435 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
35 of 435 references.
References · 35
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
- 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 166
- 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
- 2021Argumentative XAI: A Surveycited by 67
- 2018A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance Measurecited by 51
- 2024Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementationcited by 21
- 2019Do Not Trust Additive Explanationscited by 16
23 more
- 2021Explainable Machine Learning with Prior Knowledge: An Overviewcited by 15
- 2021Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Explainability for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 10
- 2025Which LIME should I trust? Concepts, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 8
- 2021Understanding surrogate explanations: the interplay between complexity, fidelity and coveragecited by 6
- 2019Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligencecited by 5
- 2020Variance based sensitivity analysis for Monte Carlo and importance sampling reliability assessment with Gaussian processescited by 5
- 2020Deep Argumentative Explanationscited by 5
- 2025Unveil Sources of Uncertainty: Feature Contribution to Conformal Prediction Intervalscited by 5
- 2021Pitfalls of Explainable ML: An Industry Perspectivecited by 4
- 2023Framework for Certification of AI-Based Systemscited by 4
- 2023Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Predictive Process Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 4
- 2025Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization With Mixed-categorical Design Variables for Expensive-to-evaluate Aeronautical Applicationscited by 4
- 2025Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tonecited by 4
- 2025Exposing the Illusion of Fairness: Auditing Vulnerabilities to Distributional Manipulation Attackscited by 4
- 2025iLOCO: Distribution-Free Inference for Feature Interactionscited by 3
- 2025Bayesian Optimization of a Lightweight and Accurate Neural Network for Aerodynamic Performance Predictioncited by 3
- 2025Challenges in interpretability of additive modelscited by 3
- 2025Beyond Shapley Values: Cooperative Games for the Interpretation of Machine Learning Modelscited by 3
- 2024Hacking a surrogate model approach to XAIcited by 2
- 2024Automated Explanation Selection for Scientific Discoverycited by 2
- 2024Inherently Interpretable Tree Ensemble Learningcited by 2
- 2025Interpretable SHAP-bounded Bayesian Optimization for Underwater Acoustic Metamaterial Coating Designcited by 1
- 2025Balancing the exploration-exploitation trade-off in active learning for surrogate model-based reliability analysis via multi-objective optimizationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.